Bravo Paco E, Goudarzi Behnaz, Rana Uzma, Filho Paulo Togni, Castillo Raymond, Rababy Christopher, Ewertz Marjorie, Ziessman Harvey A, Cooper David S, Ladenson Paul W, Wahl Richard L
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD, USA.
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2013 May 22;6(5):320-33. Print 2013.
Radioactive therapy with (131)I (RAI) is commonly used during the management of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). The aim of this study was to determine the clinical significance of discordant findings between pre-RAI whole body scan (WBS) with (123)I and post-RAI WBS in the management of DTC. We retrospectively evaluated 342 individuals between 2002 and 2008 who had a diagnosis of DTC and underwent RAI. All had WBS one day before RAI and WBS one week after RAI. Patients were divided into 3 groups: 1) RAI-naive subjects without known distant metastatic disease (M1); 2) patients with history of prior RAI and persistent disease (except M1); and 3) patients with known M1. In Group 1 (n=311), 7% of patients (n=22) had discordant scans, but in only 4 of these cases did this represent true disease (3 unsuspected lung and 1 mediastinal node metastasis). In the remaining 18 patients, discordant findings corresponded to physiologic or other benign causes. In group 2 (n=23), 7 subjects (30%) had discordant findings and all of the discrepant sites consisted of loco-regional nodal disease in the neck/upper mediastinum (n=6) and M1 in lung (n=1). In group 3 (n=8), 5 patients (62%) showed discordant uptake in lung and bone which corresponded to the locations of known M1. A total of 12 patients with iodine-avid M1 were identified on post-RAI WBS (3.5% of entire cohort). Pre-RAI WBS was only concordant in 3 of these cases (25%). In conclusion, the significance of pre and post-RAI WBS is highly influenced by the clinical setting. Unsuspected distant metastatic disease is infrequent in RAI-naive patients without known M1, where most discordant findings are usually due to benign explanations, and represent false positive findings in this group. In contrast, in patients with history of previous RAI or known M1, discordant results likely correspond to true disease. In our study, pre-RAI scans showed a low yield to detect iodine-avid distant metastatic disease when compared to post-RAI scans.
采用(131)I进行放射性治疗(RAI)常用于分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)患者的治疗。本研究的目的是确定在DTC治疗中,(123)I预RAI全身扫描(WBS)与RAI后WBS结果不一致的临床意义。我们回顾性评估了2002年至2008年间342例诊断为DTC并接受RAI治疗的患者。所有患者在RAI前一天和RAI后一周均进行了WBS检查。患者分为3组:1)初治且无已知远处转移疾病(M1)的患者;2)有RAI治疗史且疾病持续存在(不包括M1)的患者;3)已知有M1的患者。在第1组(n = 311)中,7%的患者(n = 22)扫描结果不一致,但其中只有4例代表真正的疾病(3例为未怀疑的肺部转移和1例纵隔淋巴结转移)。在其余18例患者中,不一致的结果对应于生理性或其他良性原因。在第2组(n = 23)中,7例患者(30%)有不一致的结果,所有差异部位均为颈部/上纵隔的局部区域淋巴结疾病(n = 6)和肺部M1(n = 1)。在第3组(n = 8)中,5例患者(62%)肺部和骨骼出现不一致的摄取,与已知M1的部位相对应。在RAI后WBS上共发现12例碘摄取阳性的M1患者(占整个队列的3.5%)。在这些病例中,RAI前WBS仅在3例中结果一致(25%)。总之,RAI前后WBS的意义受临床情况的高度影响。在无已知M1的初治患者中,未怀疑的远处转移疾病很少见,其中大多数不一致的结果通常是良性原因导致的,在该组中为假阳性结果。相比之下,在有RAI治疗史或已知M1的患者中,不一致的结果可能对应真正的疾病。在我们的研究中,与RAI后扫描相比,RAI前扫描检测碘摄取阳性远处转移疾病的阳性率较低。