Khoroushi Maryam, Shirban Farinaz, Shirban Mohammadreza
Associate Professor, Dental Materials Research Center and Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
J Dent (Tehran). 2013 Jan;10(1):32-40. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
In recent years, newly developed solvent-free dental adhesives have been introduced. The aim of this study was to evaluate the marginal integrity of a new one-step solvent-free self-etch adhesive and to compare it with a commonly used two-step self-etch adhesive as the gold standard.
Class V cavities (2×4×1.5 mm) were prepared on the buccal aspects of 28 human premolars. The cervical margins of the cavity preparations were placed 1 mm apical to the CEJ. Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB) (two-step self-etch adhesive) and Bond 1SF (B1SF) (one-step self-etch adhesive) were applied to the cavities in groups 1 and 2 (n=14), respectively. Then, the specimens were restored with A2 shade of APX composite resin. Each group was evaluated for dye penetration under a stereomicroscope at ×32 after 24 hours and 500 rounds of thermocycling. Statistical analyses were carried out using Mann Whitney test (α=0.05). In addition, in each experimental group, two specimens were prepared for analysis under SEM.
There were no significant differences in enamel margin microleakage between the two adhesives used (P=0.24(; whereas, there were significant differences in dentin margin microleakage between CSEB and B1SF (P=0.004). Dentin microleakage of B1SF was higher than that of CSEB.
Results showed that the enamel marginal integrity of B1SF as a newly developed one-step solvent-free self-etch adhesive was similar to that of CSEB as a commonly used two-step self-etch; however, dentinal sealing of CSEB was better than that of B1SF.
近年来,新型无溶剂牙科粘合剂已被引入。本研究的目的是评估一种新型一步法无溶剂自酸蚀粘合剂的边缘完整性,并将其与作为金标准的常用两步法自酸蚀粘合剂进行比较。
在28颗人类前磨牙的颊面制备V类洞(2×4×1.5毫米)。洞制备的颈缘位于釉牙骨质界(CEJ)根尖1毫米处。分别将Clearfil SE Bond(CSEB)(两步法自酸蚀粘合剂)和Bond 1SF(B1SF)(一步法自酸蚀粘合剂)应用于第1组和第2组的洞(n = 14)。然后,用A2色的APX复合树脂修复标本。每组在24小时和500次热循环后,于×32的体视显微镜下评估染料渗透情况。使用Mann Whitney检验进行统计分析(α = 0.05)。此外,在每个实验组中,制备两个标本用于扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析。
两种使用的粘合剂在釉质边缘微渗漏方面无显著差异(P = 0.24);然而,CSEB和B1SF在牙本质边缘微渗漏方面存在显著差异(P = 0.004)。B1SF的牙本质微渗漏高于CSEB。
结果表明,作为新型一步法无溶剂自酸蚀粘合剂的B1SF的釉质边缘完整性与作为常用两步法自酸蚀粘合剂的CSEB相似;然而,CSEB的牙本质封闭性优于B1SF。