Suppr超能文献

司来吉兰透皮贴剂:重度抑郁症患者的使用模式及依从性

Selegiline transdermal system: use pattern and adherence in patients with major depressive disorder.

作者信息

Sclar David A, Cohen Lawrence J, Portland Kimberly Blanchard

机构信息

Midwestern University College of Pharmacy, Glendale, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2013;15(1). doi: 10.4088/PCC.12br01466. Epub 2013 Feb 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To discern the pattern of use of selegiline transdermal system as well as the level of adherence relative to other pharmacotherapies for treatment of major depressive disorder.

METHOD

Deidentified patient-level data (2010-2011; N = 2,985) were abstracted from US longitudinal archives (Medicaid, Medicare, managed care) in this retrospective exploratory claims-based analysis. Major depressive disorder was defined as ICD-9-CM codes 292.2, 296.3, 300.4, or 311. Antidepressant treatment failure was defined as receipt of < 90 days of initial antidepressant.

RESULTS

Most patients received selegiline transdermal system as a second or third treatment option following treatment failure, and only 71 patients received it as first-line therapy. Patients were more likely to receive selegiline transdermal system for 60, 90, or 180 days compared to other therapies irrespective of treatment failure (P < .05). Among patients who did not fail treatment in the first 90 days, selegiline transdermal system was associated with a greater probability of receipt compared to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors at 120 days (odds ratio [OR] = 1.21; 95% CI, 1.14-1.47) and 180 days (OR = 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.28).

CONCLUSION

Although limited by the small sample size of patients receiving selegiline transdermal system versus other pharmacotherapies, the results suggest that after antidepressant treatment failure, earlier use of selegiline transdermal system may be warranted.

摘要

目的

识别司来吉兰透皮系统的使用模式以及相对于其他治疗重度抑郁症的药物疗法的依从水平。

方法

在这项基于回顾性探索性索赔的分析中,从美国纵向档案(医疗补助、医疗保险、管理式医疗)中提取了去识别化的患者层面数据(2010 - 2011年;N = 2985)。重度抑郁症被定义为国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本(ICD - 9 - CM)编码292.2、296.3、300.4或311。抗抑郁治疗失败被定义为初始抗抑郁药物治疗时间少于90天。

结果

大多数患者在治疗失败后将司来吉兰透皮系统作为第二或第三种治疗选择,只有71名患者将其作为一线治疗。无论治疗是否失败,与其他疗法相比,患者接受司来吉兰透皮系统治疗60天、90天或180天的可能性更高(P < 0.05)。在最初90天内治疗未失败的患者中,与选择性5 - 羟色胺再摄取抑制剂或5 - 羟色胺去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂相比,司来吉兰透皮系统在120天(优势比[OR] = 1.21;95%置信区间,1.14 - 1.47)和180天(OR = 1.09;95%置信区间,1.01 - 1.28)时被接受的概率更高。

结论

尽管与其他药物疗法相比,接受司来吉兰透皮系统治疗的患者样本量较小,结果表明在抗抑郁治疗失败后,可能有必要更早使用司来吉兰透皮系统。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验