Division of Basic Biomedical Sciences, Sanford School of Medicine, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD 57069, USA.
Mol Pain. 2013 Jun 1;9:26. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-9-26.
Although a number of clinical and preclinical studies have demonstrated analgesic effects of cannabinoid treatments, there are also instances when cannabinoids have had no effect or even exacerbated pain. The observed pro-nociceptive effects appear to be due to cannabinoid-induced disinhibition of afferent synaptic input to nociceptive circuits. To better understand how cannabinoid-mediated plasticity can have both pro- and anti-nociceptive effects, we examined the possibility that cannabinoids differentially modulate nociceptive vs. non-nociceptive synapses onto a shared postsynaptic target. These experiments were carried out in the central nervous system (CNS) of the medicinal leech, in which it is possible to intracellularly record from presynaptic nociceptive (N-cell) or pressure-sensitive (P-cell) neurons and their shared postsynaptic targets.
The endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2AG) elicited significant long-lasting depression in nociceptive (N-cell) synapses. However, non-nociceptive (P-cell) synapses were potentiated following 2AG treatment. 2AG-induced potentiation of non-nociceptive synapses was blocked by the TRPV antagonist SB366791, suggesting involvement of the same TRPV-like receptor that has already been shown to mediate endocannabinoid-dependent depression in nociceptive inputs. Treatment with the GABA receptor antagonist bicuculline also blocked 2AG-induced potentiation, consistent with the idea that increased synaptic signaling was the result of endocannabinoid-mediated disinhibition. Interestingly, while bicuculline by itself increased non-nociceptive synaptic transmission, nociceptive synapses were depressed by this GABA receptor antagonist indicating that nociceptive synapses were actually excited by GABAergic input. Consistent with these observations, GABA application depolarized the nociceptive afferent and hyperpolarized the non-nociceptive afferent.
These findings show that endocannabinoids can differentially modulate nociceptive vs. non-nociceptive synapses and that GABAergic regulation of these synapses plays an important role in determining whether endocannabinoids have a potentiating or depressing effect.
尽管许多临床和临床前研究表明大麻素治疗具有镇痛作用,但也有大麻素无效甚至加重疼痛的情况。观察到的促伤害感受效应似乎是由于大麻素诱导的伤害感受回路传入突触输入的去抑制作用。为了更好地理解大麻素介导的可塑性如何具有促伤害感受和抗伤害感受作用,我们研究了大麻素是否可以差异调节作用于共同突触后靶的伤害感受和非伤害感受突触的可能性。这些实验是在医学水蛭的中枢神经系统 (CNS) 中进行的,在该系统中可以从伤害感受 (N 细胞) 或压力敏感 (P 细胞) 神经元及其共同的突触后靶标进行细胞内记录。
内源性大麻素 2-花生四烯酸甘油 (2AG) 在伤害感受 (N 细胞) 突触中引起显著的长时间抑制。然而,2AG 处理后非伤害感受 (P 细胞) 突触被增强。2AG 诱导的非伤害感受突触的增强被 TRPV 拮抗剂 SB366791 阻断,表明涉及已显示介导伤害感受传入中内源性大麻素依赖性抑制的相同 TRPV 样受体。用 GABA 受体拮抗剂 Bicuculline 处理也阻断了 2AG 诱导的增强,这与增加突触信号是内源性大麻素介导的去抑制的结果一致。有趣的是,虽然 Bicuculline 本身增加了非伤害感受突触传递,但该 GABA 受体拮抗剂使伤害感受突触被抑制,表明伤害感受突触实际上被 GABA 能传入兴奋。与这些观察结果一致,GABA 的应用使伤害感受传入去极化,而非伤害感受传入超极化。
这些发现表明,内源性大麻素可以差异调节伤害感受和非伤害感受突触,GABA 能对这些突触的调节在确定内源性大麻素是否具有增强或抑制作用方面起着重要作用。