• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前哨淋巴结冰冻切片分析检测亚洲乳腺癌微转移的准确性——来自巴基斯坦的经验

Accuracy of frozen section analysis of sentinel lymph nodes for the detection of Asian breast cancer micrometastasis - experience from Pakistan.

作者信息

Hashmi Atif Ali, Faridi Naveen, Khurshid Amna, Naqvi Hanna, Malik Babar, Malik Faisal Riaz, Fida Zubaida, Mujtuba Shafaq

机构信息

Department of Histopathology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(4):2657-62. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.4.2657.

DOI:10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.4.2657
PMID:23725191
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy has now become the standard of care for patients with clinically node negative breast cancer for diagnosis and also in order to determine the need for immediate axillary clearance. Several large scale studies confirmed the diagnostic reliability of this method. However, micrometastases are frequently missed on frozen sections. Recent studies showed that both disease free interval and overall survival are significantly affected by the presence of micrometastatic disease. The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of intraoperative frozen section analysis of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) for the detection of breast cancer micrometastasis and to evaluate the status of non-sentinel lymph nodes (non-SLNs) in those patients subjected to further axillary sampling.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study on 154 patients who underwent SLN biopsy from January 2008 till October 2011. The SLNs were sectioned at 2 mm intervals and submitted entirely for frozen sections. Three levels of each section submitted are examined and the results were compared with further levels on paraffin sections.

RESULTS

Overall 40% of patients (62/154) were found to be SLN positive on final (paraffin section) histology, out of which 44 demonstrated macrometastases (>2mm) and 18 micrometastases (<2mm). The overall sensitivity and specificity of frozen section analysis of SLN for the detection of macrometastasis was found to be 100% while those for micrometastasis were 33.3% and 100%, respectively. Moreover 20% of patients who had micrometastases in SLN had positive non-SLNs on final histology.

CONCLUSIONS

Frozen section analysis of SLNs lacks sufficient accuracy to rule out micrometastasis by current protocols. Therefore these need to be revised in order to pick up micrometastasis which appears to have clinical significance. We suggest that this can be achieved by examining more step sections of blocks.

摘要

背景

术中前哨淋巴结活检现已成为临床淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者诊断的标准治疗方法,同时也是为了确定是否需要立即进行腋窝清扫。多项大规模研究证实了该方法的诊断可靠性。然而,在冰冻切片上经常会漏诊微转移。近期研究表明,无病生存期和总生存期均受到微转移疾病存在的显著影响。本研究的目的是确定术中前哨淋巴结(SLN)冰冻切片分析检测乳腺癌微转移的敏感性和特异性,并评估那些接受进一步腋窝取样患者的非前哨淋巴结(非SLN)状态。

材料与方法

我们对2008年1月至2011年10月期间接受SLN活检的154例患者进行了回顾性研究。将SLN以2毫米的间隔切片,并全部送检进行冰冻切片。对送检的每个切片的三个层面进行检查,并将结果与石蜡切片的进一步层面进行比较。

结果

总体而言,在最终(石蜡切片)组织学检查中,40%的患者(62/154)被发现SLN阳性,其中44例显示大转移灶(>2毫米),18例显示微转移灶(<2毫米)。发现SLN冰冻切片分析检测大转移灶的总体敏感性和特异性分别为100%,而检测微转移灶的敏感性和特异性分别为33.3%和100%。此外,SLN中有微转移灶的患者中,20%在最终组织学检查中非SLN呈阳性。

结论

按照当前方案,SLN的冰冻切片分析缺乏足够的准确性来排除微转移。因此,需要对这些方案进行修订,以便发现似乎具有临床意义的微转移。我们建议,可以通过检查更多的组织块连续切片来实现这一点。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of frozen section analysis of sentinel lymph nodes for the detection of Asian breast cancer micrometastasis - experience from Pakistan.前哨淋巴结冰冻切片分析检测亚洲乳腺癌微转移的准确性——来自巴基斯坦的经验
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(4):2657-62. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.4.2657.
2
False negative rate for intraoperative sentinel lymph node frozen section in patients with breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of patients in a single Asian institution.乳腺癌患者术中前哨淋巴结冰冻切片的假阴性率:对一家亚洲单一机构患者的回顾性分析
J Clin Pathol. 2015 Jul;68(7):536-40. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202799. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
3
Intraoperative imprint cytologic evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes for lobular carcinoma of the breast.乳腺癌小叶癌前哨淋巴结的术中印片细胞学评估
Ann Surg. 2004 Jan;239(1):61-6. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000103072.34708.e3.
4
Frozen section in axillary sentinel lymph nodes for diagnosis of breast cancer micrometastasis.腋窝前哨淋巴结冰冻切片诊断乳腺癌微转移。
Anticancer Res. 2009 Nov;29(11):4711-6.
5
Breast cancer micrometastasis and axillary sentinel lymph nodes frozen section. Our experience and review of literature.乳腺癌微转移和腋窝前哨淋巴结冷冻切片。我们的经验和文献复习。
Int J Surg. 2014;12 Suppl 1:S12-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.044. Epub 2014 May 22.
6
The accuracy of intraoperative frozen section analysis of the sentinel lymph nodes during breast cancer surgery.乳腺癌手术中前哨淋巴结术中冰冻切片分析的准确性。
Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;49(5):208-11.
7
Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy in early stage breast carcinoma.早期乳腺癌的淋巴绘图与前哨淋巴结切除术
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2000 Jun;19(2):141-4.
8
Intraoperative molecular assay for sentinel lymph node metastases in early stage breast cancer: a comparative analysis between one-step nucleic acid amplification whole node assay and routine frozen section histology.早期乳腺癌前哨淋巴结转移的术中分子检测:一步法核酸扩增全淋巴结检测与常规冷冻切片组织学的对比分析。
Cancer. 2011 Oct 1;117(19):4365-74. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26060. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
9
Pathologic examination of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer.乳腺癌前哨淋巴结的病理检查
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 1999 Jul;8(3):469-79.
10
Sentinel lymph node as a new marker for therapeutic planning in breast cancer patients.前哨淋巴结作为乳腺癌患者治疗规划的新标志物。
J Surg Oncol. 2004 Mar;85(3):102-11. doi: 10.1002/jso.20022.

引用本文的文献

1
Pregnancy-associated triple-negative breast cancer: A case report and literature review.妊娠相关性三阴性乳腺癌:病例报告及文献复习。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 11;103(41):e40059. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040059.
2
Feasibility of Breast Cancer Metastasis Assessment of Ex Vivo Sentinel Lymph Nodes through a p-H&E Optical Coherence Microscopic Imaging System.通过p-H&E光学相干显微成像系统对离体前哨淋巴结进行乳腺癌转移评估的可行性
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 10;14(24):6081. doi: 10.3390/cancers14246081.
3
Is sentinel lymph node biopsy without frozen section in early stage breast cancer sufficient in accordance with ACOSOG-Z0011? A retrospective review from King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital.
早期乳腺癌中是否可以不进行冰冻切片的前哨淋巴结活检,符合 ACOSOG-Z0011 标准?来自朱拉隆功国王纪念医院的回顾性研究。
BMC Surg. 2022 Jul 6;22(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01709-6.
4
Evolution of Frozen Section in Carcinoma Breast: Systematic Review.乳腺癌冰冻切片的发展:系统评价
Int J Breast Cancer. 2022 May 23;2022:4958580. doi: 10.1155/2022/4958580. eCollection 2022.
5
Impact of Histological Type and Grade on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Intraoperative Frozen Section for Detecting Breast Cancer Metastasis to Axillary Sentinel Lymph Nodes.组织学类型和分级对术中冰冻切片检测乳腺癌腋窝前哨淋巴结转移诊断准确性的影响
Cureus. 2021 Jul 3;13(7):e16146. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16146. eCollection 2021 Jul.
6
Diagnostic Accuracy of Intraoperative Touch Imprint Cytology for the Diagnosis of Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis of Breast Cancer: Comparison With Intraoperative Frozen Section Evaluation.术中触摸印片细胞学诊断乳腺癌腋窝前哨淋巴结转移的诊断准确性:与术中冰冻切片评估的比较
Cureus. 2021 Jan 28;13(1):e12960. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12960.
7
Ki67 index in intrinsic breast cancer subtypes and its association with prognostic parameters.原发性乳腺癌亚型中的Ki67指数及其与预后参数的关联。
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Sep 23;12(1):605. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4653-x.
8
Prognostic significance of p16 & p53 immunohistochemical expression in triple negative breast cancer.p16和p53免疫组化表达在三阴性乳腺癌中的预后意义
BMC Clin Pathol. 2018 Oct 3;18:9. doi: 10.1186/s12907-018-0077-0. eCollection 2018.
9
Cytokeratin 5/6 and cytokeratin 8/18 expression in triple negative breast cancers: clinicopathologic significance in South-Asian population.细胞角蛋白5/6和细胞角蛋白8/18在三阴性乳腺癌中的表达:南亚人群中的临床病理意义
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Jun 8;11(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3477-4.
10
Prognostic parameters of luminal A and luminal B intrinsic breast cancer subtypes of Pakistani patients.巴基斯坦患者腔面 A 型和腔面 B 型乳腺癌内在亚型的预后参数。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jan 2;16(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1299-9.