• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

第一部分:“因精神错乱而无罪”登记处:对康涅狄格州被判定因精神错乱而无罪者所收集数据的初步分析。

Part I: The NGRI Registry: initial analyses of data collected on Connecticut insanity acquittees.

作者信息

Zonana H V, Wells J A, Getz M A, Buchanan J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven CT 06519.

出版信息

Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1990;18(2):115-28.

PMID:2372573
Abstract

The NGRI Registry is a comprehensive census database collected by the Law and Psychiatry Division of the Department of Psychiatry at the Yale University School of Medicine. This longitudinal database was compiled following a systematic search of all available docket books from the superior courts and mental health records from the state hospitals in Connecticut beginning in January 1970. Detailed life span information is available for 364 insanity acquittees identified during the search. Comparative analyses with four other locales suggested that there were regional differences in diagnoses of and crimes committed by the acquittees. These initial analyses demonstrate the promise of this registry becoming one tool for collaborative research on issues relevant to law and mental health.

摘要

“因精神错乱而无罪”登记处是一个综合普查数据库,由耶鲁大学医学院精神病学系法律与精神病学部门收集。这个纵向数据库是在对康涅狄格州高等法院所有可用的诉讼记录簿以及该州医院的心理健康记录进行系统检索后编制而成的,检索始于1970年1月。对于检索过程中确定的364名因精神错乱而宣判无罪者,可获取详细的寿命信息。与其他四个地区的比较分析表明,这些无罪者在诊断和所犯罪行方面存在地区差异。这些初步分析表明,这个登记处有望成为法律与心理健康相关问题合作研究的一种工具。

相似文献

1
Part I: The NGRI Registry: initial analyses of data collected on Connecticut insanity acquittees.第一部分:“因精神错乱而无罪”登记处:对康涅狄格州被判定因精神错乱而无罪者所收集数据的初步分析。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1990;18(2):115-28.
2
Part II: Sex differences in persons found not guilty by reason of insanity: analysis of data from the Connecticut NGRI Registry.
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1990;18(2):129-42.
3
A comparison of female versus male insanity acquittees in Colorado.科罗拉多州女性与男性被判定无罪的精神病患者的比较。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1995;23(4):523-32.
4
The impact of system design on the characteristics of Missouri's insanity acquittees.系统设计对密苏里州因精神错乱而宣判无罪者特征的影响。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1997;25(4):509-29.
5
The volume and characteristics of insanity defense pleas: an eight-state study.精神错乱抗辩的数量及特点:一项八州研究
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1991;19(4):331-8.
6
The unconditional release of mentally ill offenders from indefinite commitment: a study of Missouri insanity acquittees.对无限期关押的精神病罪犯的无条件释放:对密苏里州因精神错乱宣判无罪者的研究。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1999;27(4):563-79.
7
Outcomes of assertive community treatment in an NGRI conditional release program.在一项对因精神错乱而无罪的有条件释放计划中积极社区治疗的结果。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2004;32(3):291-303.
8
Evaluation and treatment of insanity acquittees in the community.社区中被判定为精神错乱无罪者的评估与治疗。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1986;14(3):231-44.
9
Disposition of insanity acquittees in Illinois.伊利诺伊州被判定因精神错乱而无罪者的处置情况。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1988;16(1):11-24.
10
Assessing Insanity Acquittee Recidivism in Connecticut.评估康涅狄格州被判定精神错乱无罪者的再犯罪情况。
Behav Sci Law. 2016 Mar;34(2-3):423-43. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2222. Epub 2016 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
What is the VA? The Largest Educator of Health Care Professionals in the U.S.什么是退伍军人事务部?美国最大的医疗保健专业人员教育机构
Fed Pract. 2016 Jul;33(7):6-7.
2
Central registry in psychiatry: A structured review.精神病学中央登记处:一项结构化综述。
Ind Psychiatry J. 2014 Jan;23(1):10-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-6748.144939.
3
Rates of homicide during the first episode of psychosis and after treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.首发精神病期和治疗后期间的凶杀率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Schizophr Bull. 2010 Jul;36(4):702-12. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn144. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
4
Administrative issues in the follow-up treatment of insanity acquittees.
J Ment Health Adm. 1991 Fall;18(3):242-52. doi: 10.1007/BF02518595.