Arai Takahiro, Miaki Hiroichi
Division of Rehabilitation Science, Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School for Health Studies, University of Kanazawa, Kanazawa, Japan.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2013 Jul;28(6):642-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 May 28.
Dynamic alignment of "knee-in & toe-out" is a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament injury and is possibly influenced by static knee alignment, range of tibial rotation and tibial plateau geometry.
Twenty-eight healthy women were classified into valgus, neutral and varus groups based on static alignment of their knees. A 3-dimensional motion analysis was carried out for a single limb drop landing. The range of tibial rotation and posterior tibial slope angle was measured by MRI. Comparison among the 3 groups and correlation between the angles was analyzed during motion.
The differences between the medial and lateral posterior tibial slope angles were greater (P=0.019), also range of internal tibial rotation for the valgus group (P=0.017) and, for the varus group, the "knee-in" angle (P=0.048). The "knee-in" angle correlated significantly with the tibial rotation angle (R=-0.39, P=0.038), and the range of tibial rotation correlated with the variations between the medial and lateral posterior tibial slope angles (R=0.90, P=0.003).
The range of tibial rotation, posterior tibial slope and "knee-in" angle varied according to whether the knee was in valgus or varus with the range of tibial rotation dependent on the posterior tibial slope angle. The greater the "knee-in" angle became, the smaller the internal tibial rotation was, acting in a kinetic chain. The results suggest that static alignment of the knee may be utilized as a predictor for potential problems that occur during motion.
“膝内扣与足外旋”的动态对线是前交叉韧带损伤的一个风险因素,并且可能受到静态膝关节对线、胫骨旋转范围和胫骨平台几何形状的影响。
根据28名健康女性的静态膝关节对线情况将她们分为外翻组、中立组和内翻组。对单腿下落着地进行三维运动分析。通过磁共振成像测量胫骨旋转范围和胫骨后倾角。分析三组之间的差异以及运动过程中各角度之间的相关性。
胫骨后内侧和外侧斜率角之间的差异更大(P = 0.019),外翻组的胫骨内旋范围也更大(P = 0.017),内翻组的“膝内扣”角度更大(P = 0.048)。“膝内扣”角度与胫骨旋转角度显著相关(R = -0.39,P = 0.038),胫骨旋转范围与胫骨后内侧和外侧斜率角之间的差异相关(R = 0.90,P = 0.003)。
胫骨旋转范围、胫骨后倾角和“膝内扣”角度根据膝关节是外翻还是内翻而有所不同,胫骨旋转范围取决于胫骨后倾角。“膝内扣”角度越大,胫骨内旋越小,在动力链中起作用。结果表明,膝关节的静态对线可作为运动过程中潜在问题的预测指标。