Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Oct;28(9):1693-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.03.017. Epub 2013 May 28.
The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of cementless primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in sickle cell patients compared to the remaining cohort of osteonecrosis patients who did not have this disease. Thirty-two sickle cell patients (42 hips) who had a mean age of 37 years and mean follow-up of 7.5 years (range, 5-11 years) were compared to 87 non-sickle cell osteonecrosis patients (102 hips) who had mean age of 43 years and mean follow-up of 7 years (range, 3-10.5 years). Outcomes evaluated included implant survivorship, Harris hip scores, complication rates, radiographic outcomes, and Short Form-(SF-36) health questionnaire. There were no significant differences in aseptic implant survivorship (95 vs. 97%), Harris hip scores (87 vs. 88 points), SF-36 score, or radiographic findings between the two patient cohorts. In light of these findings, we believe that the outcomes of THA improved in sickle cell patients with optimized medical management and the use of cementless prosthetic devices.
本研究旨在比较镰状细胞病患者与未患该病的骨坏死患者行初次非骨水泥全髋关节置换术(THA)的结局。将 32 例镰状细胞病患者(42 髋)的平均年龄为 37 岁,平均随访 7.5 年(5-11 年)与 87 例非镰状细胞骨坏死患者(102 髋)的平均年龄为 43 岁,平均随访 7 年(3-10.5 年)进行比较。评估的结果包括植入物存活率、Harris 髋关节评分、并发症发生率、影像学结果和简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)。两组患者的无菌性植入物存活率(95%比 97%)、Harris 髋关节评分(87 分比 88 分)、SF-36 评分或影像学发现均无显著差异。鉴于这些发现,我们认为通过优化的药物治疗和使用非骨水泥假体装置,镰状细胞病患者的 THA 结局得到了改善。