Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Epilepsy Res. 2013 Sep;106(1-2):237-43. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2013.04.010. Epub 2013 May 28.
Older antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are known to have a narrow therapeutic index. As a consequence, switching between bioequivalent AEDs remains controversial in the management of epilepsy. We investigated the association between A-rated switching of each class of currently available AED and emergent treatment for a seizure-related event.
We used a case-control method and claims data from the 2010 to 2011 Truven Health MarketScan(®) Commercial Claims Database to estimate the risk of seizure following a medication switch. Cases and controls with an epilepsy diagnosis were identified by emergency/inpatient or outpatient visit claims, respectively. Cases and controls (N=9110) were matched 1:1 by age, epilepsy diagnosis category and seizure medication. The exposure was defined as a switch between A-rated AEDs during the 90 days prior to index date. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the association, adjusting for gender, baseline Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index (0, 1, 2, or 3+), region (Northeast, Central, South, and West), and total AED medications.
A switch between A-rated AEDs occurred in 1053 (23.2%) cases and 827 (18.1%) matched controls. The unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios of a seizure-related event for switching were 1.38 (95% CI: 1.25-1.52) and 1.27 (95% CI: 1.14-1.41), respectively. The independent risk of an event also increased with each category increase in the Charlson score (CCI=1: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02-1.33; CCI=2: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.09-1.62; CCI=3+: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.64-2.41). Older AEDs had infrequent switches compared to newer agents and were not associated with events.
We found a modest association between AED switching and seizure-related events. Our analysis suggests that the behavior of switching alone may lead to seizure-related events regardless of the medication or type of switch. Other disease or environmental characteristics may contribute to this association. Based on these and other findings, health care professionals and patients should be cautious about switching bioequivalent AEDs.
已知较老的抗癫痫药物(AED)的治疗指数较窄。因此,在癫痫的治疗中,在生物等效的 AED 之间进行转换仍然存在争议。我们研究了目前可用的 AED 每类药物 A 级转换与与癫痫发作相关的治疗之间的关联。
我们使用病例对照方法和 2010 年至 2011 年 Truven Health MarketScan(®)商业索赔数据库中的索赔数据来估计药物转换后癫痫发作的风险。通过急诊/住院或门诊就诊索赔分别确定癫痫诊断病例和对照。病例和对照(N=9110)按年龄、癫痫诊断类别和抗癫痫药物匹配 1:1。暴露定义为在索引日期前 90 天内进行 A 级 AED 之间的转换。条件逻辑回归用于估计关联,调整性别、基线 Deyo-Charlson 合并症指数(0、1、2 或 3+)、区域(东北部、中部、南部和西部)和总 AED 药物。
1053(23.2%)例病例和 827(18.1%)例匹配对照发生 A 级 AED 之间的转换。未经调整和调整后的癫痫相关事件发生的比值比为 1.38(95%CI:1.25-1.52)和 1.27(95%CI:1.14-1.41)。事件的独立风险也随着 Charlson 评分的每个类别增加而增加(CCI=1:1.17,95%CI:1.02-1.33;CCI=2:1.33,95%CI:1.09-1.62;CCI=3+:1.99,95%CI:1.64-2.41)。与较新药物相比,较老的 AED 转换频率较低,与事件无关。
我们发现 AED 转换与癫痫发作相关事件之间存在适度关联。我们的分析表明,仅转换行为可能导致与癫痫发作相关的事件,而与药物或转换类型无关。其他疾病或环境特征可能促成这种关联。基于这些和其他发现,医疗保健专业人员和患者在使用生物等效的 AED 时应谨慎。