• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[艰难梭菌感染的抗菌治疗。科学证据的系统评价与荟萃分析]

[Antimicrobial therapy of Clostridium difficile infection. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the scientific evidence].

作者信息

Brodszky Valentin, Gulácsi László, Ludwig Endre, Prinz Gyula, Banai János, Reményi Péter, Strbák Bálint, Kertész Adrienne, Kopcsóné Németh Irén, Zsoldiné Urbán Edit, Baji Petra, Péntek Márta

机构信息

Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem Egészség-gazdaságtani és Egészségügyi Technológiaelemzési Kutatóközpont, Budapest, Fővám tér 8. 1093.

出版信息

Orv Hetil. 2013 Jun 9;154(23):890-9. doi: 10.1556/OH.2013.29627.

DOI:10.1556/OH.2013.29627
PMID:23728312
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Clostridium difficile is the leading cause of antibiotic associated infectious nosocomial diarrhoea. Limited number of new pharmaceutical products have been developed and registered in the past decades for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection. The available scientific evidence is limited and hardly comparable.

AIM

To analyse the clinical efficacy and safety of metronidazole, vancomycin and fidaxomicin in the therapy of Clostridium difficile infection.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature data.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis of literature data showed no significant difference between these antibiotics in clinical cure endpoint (odss ratios: fidaxomicin vs. vancomycin 1.19; vancomycin vs. metronidazol 1.69 and fidaxomicin vs. metronidazol 2.00). However, fidaxomicin therapy was significantly more effective than vancomicin and metronidazol in endpoints of recurrence and global cure (odds ratios: fidaxomicin vs. vancomycin 0.47; vancomycin vs. metronidazol 0.91 és fidaxomicin vs. metronidazol 0.43). There was no significant difference between fidaxomicin, vancomycin and metronidazole in safety endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

Each antibiotic similarly improved clinical cure. Fidaxomicin was the most effective therapeutic alternative in lowering the rate of recurrent Clostridium difficile infections.

摘要

引言

艰难梭菌是抗生素相关性医院感染性腹泻的主要病因。在过去几十年中,用于治疗艰难梭菌感染的新药品数量有限且已注册的产品较少。现有科学证据有限且难以比较。

目的

分析甲硝唑、万古霉素和非达霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染的临床疗效和安全性。

方法

对文献数据进行系统评价和荟萃分析。

结果

文献数据的荟萃分析表明,这些抗生素在临床治愈终点方面无显著差异(比值比:非达霉素对比万古霉素为1.19;万古霉素对比甲硝唑为1.69;非达霉素对比甲硝唑为2.00)。然而,在复发和总体治愈终点方面,非达霉素治疗显著优于万古霉素和甲硝唑(比值比:非达霉素对比万古霉素为0.47;万古霉素对比甲硝唑为0.91;非达霉素对比甲硝唑为0.43)。在安全终点方面,非达霉素、万古霉素和甲硝唑之间无显著差异。

结论

每种抗生素在改善临床治愈方面效果相似。非达霉素是降低艰难梭菌复发性感染率最有效的治疗选择。

相似文献

1
[Antimicrobial therapy of Clostridium difficile infection. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the scientific evidence].[艰难梭菌感染的抗菌治疗。科学证据的系统评价与荟萃分析]
Orv Hetil. 2013 Jun 9;154(23):890-9. doi: 10.1556/OH.2013.29627.
2
Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in adults.成人艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 3;3(3):CD004610. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004610.pub5.
3
Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in adults.成人艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7(9):CD004610. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004610.pub4.
4
Real-world comparison of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin or metronidazole in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非达霉素与万古霉素或甲硝唑治疗艰难梭菌感染的真实世界比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Nov;78(11):1727-1737. doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03376-1. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
5
Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in adults.成人艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD004610. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004610.pub3.
6
Comparative effectiveness of Clostridium difficile treatments: a systematic review.艰难梭菌治疗方法的疗效比较:系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Dec 20;155(12):839-47. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-12-201112200-00007.
7
Efficacy and Safety of Metronidazole Monotherapy versus Vancomycin Monotherapy or Combination Therapy in Patients with Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.甲硝唑单药治疗与万古霉素单药治疗或联合治疗艰难梭菌感染患者的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 7;10(10):e0137252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137252. eCollection 2015.
8
Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in adults.成人艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25(1):CD004610. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004610.pub2.
9
A Systematic Literature Review of Economic Evaluations of Antibiotic Treatments for Clostridium difficile Infection.抗艰难梭菌感染抗生素治疗的经济评价系统文献回顾。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Nov;35(11):1123-1140. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0540-2.
10
Diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile in adults: a systematic review.成人艰难梭菌的诊断与治疗:系统评价。
JAMA. 2015 Jan 27;313(4):398-408. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17103.