Suppr超能文献

奥卡西平与苯妥英单药治疗癫痫的比较。

Oxcarbazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy.

作者信息

Nolan Sarah J, Muller Martie, Tudur Smith Catrin, Marson Anthony G

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Shelley's Cottage, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, UK, L69 3GS.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31(5):CD003615. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003615.pub3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in The Cochrane Library 2006, Issue 2.Worldwide, phenytoin is a commonly used antiepileptic drug. For the newer drugs such as oxcarbazepine, it is important to know how they compare with standard treatments.

OBJECTIVES

To review the best evidence comparing oxcarbazepine and phenytoin when used as monotherapy in participants with partial onset seizures or generalised tonic-clonic seizures with or without other generalised seizure types.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group's Specialised Register (22 January 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 12) and MEDLINE (1946 to 22 January 2013). We handsearched relevant journals and contacted pharmaceutical companies, original trial investigators and experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials in children or adults with partial onset seizures or generalised onset tonic-clonic seizures with a comparison of oxcarbazepine monotherapy with phenytoin monotherapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

This was an individual participant data review. Outcomes were time to (a) treatment withdrawal (b) 12-month remission (c) six-month remission and (d) first seizure post randomisation. We used Cox proportional hazards models to obtain study-specific estimates of hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) with the generic inverse variance method used to obtain the overall pooled HR and 95% CI.

MAIN RESULTS

Individual participant data were available for 480 out of 517 participants (93%) from three included trials. For remission outcomes, a HR > 1 indicates an advantage to phenytoin and for first seizure and withdrawal outcomes a HR > 1 indicates an advantage to oxcarbazepine.The main overall results (pooled HR, 95% CI) were: (i) time to withdrawal of allocated treatment 1.65 (1.08 to 2.52), (ii) time to 12-month remission 0.92 (0.68 to 1.24), (iii) time to six-month remission 0.90 (0.70 to 1.15), (iv) time to first seizure 1.07 (0.83 to 1.39). Results indicate a statistically significant advantage for oxcarbazepine over phenytoin for time to treatment withdrawal, but insufficient evidence to suggest a difference between the drugs for other outcomes. By epilepsy type, there is no significant advantage for either drug for generalised epilepsy, however there is a significant advantage for partial epilepsy with oxcarbazepine for time to treatment withdrawal (HR 1.95; 95% CI 1.15 to 3.33).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For participants with partial onset seizures oxcarbazepine is significantly less likely to be withdrawn, but current data do not allow a statement as to whether oxcarbazepine is equivalent, superior or inferior to phenytoin in terms of seizure control. However, the design of the studies may have biased seizure outcomes and misclassification of epilepsy type may have biased withdrawal rates.

摘要

背景

这是发表于《考科蓝系统评价》2006年第2期的原始考科蓝综述的更新版本。在全球范围内,苯妥英是一种常用的抗癫痫药物。对于诸如奥卡西平这类新药而言,了解它们与标准治疗方法相比的效果很重要。

目的

回顾将奥卡西平与苯妥英作为单药治疗部分性发作或全面性强直阵挛发作(伴或不伴其他全面性发作类型)患者时对比的最佳证据。

检索方法

我们检索了考科蓝癫痫组专业注册库(2013年1月22日)、考科蓝对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL,《考科蓝系统评价》2012年第12期)和MEDLINE(1946年至2013年1月22日)。我们手工检索了相关期刊,并联系了制药公司、原始试验研究者和该领域的专家。

入选标准

针对部分性发作或全面性强直阵挛发作的儿童或成人进行的随机对照试验,对比奥卡西平单药治疗与苯妥英单药治疗。

数据收集与分析

这是一项个体参与者数据综述。结局指标为(a)治疗停药时间、(b)12个月缓解时间、(c)6个月缓解时间以及(d)随机分组后首次发作时间。我们使用Cox比例风险模型获得各研究特定的风险比(HR)估计值及95%置信区间(CI),采用通用逆方差法获得总体合并的HR及95%CI。

主要结果

三项纳入试验的517名参与者中有480名(93%)提供了个体参与者数据。对于缓解结局,HR>1表明苯妥英具有优势,而对于首次发作和停药结局,HR>1表明奥卡西平具有优势。主要总体结果(合并HR,95%CI)如下:(i)分配治疗停药时间为1.65(1.08至2.52),(ii)12个月缓解时间为0.92(0.68至1.24),(iii)6个月缓解时间为0.90(0.70至1.15),(iv)首次发作时间为1.07(0.83至1.39)。结果表明,在治疗停药时间方面奥卡西平相对于苯妥英具有统计学显著优势,但没有足够证据表明在其他结局方面两种药物存在差异。按癫痫类型划分,对于全面性癫痫,两种药物均无显著优势,然而对于部分性癫痫,奥卡西平在治疗停药时间方面具有显著优势(HR 1.95;95%CI 1.15至3.33)。

作者结论

对于部分性发作的参与者,奥卡西平停药的可能性显著更低,但目前的数据无法就奥卡西平在癫痫控制方面是否等同于、优于或劣于苯妥英做出说明。然而,研究设计可能使癫痫结局产生偏差,癫痫类型的错误分类可能使停药率产生偏差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验