Zhu Liang, Zheng Wei, Zhao Feng-Chao, Guo Yi, Meng Bai-Yi, Liu Hong-Tao, Guo Kai-Jin
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical College, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China,
J Orthop Sci. 2013 Sep;18(5):762-73. doi: 10.1007/s00776-013-0411-4. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
Periprosthetic bone loss, which is common after joint arthroplasty, may cause bone loosening and lead to failed prosthetic fixation. Two previous meta-analyses have confirmed the mid-term effect of bisphosphonates (BPs) in preventing bone loss after arthroplasty. To determine long-term efficacy and gender bias of BPs after joint arthroplasty, we conducted a meta-analysis based on 17 RCTs involving 781 patients to evaluate the effect of BPs.
Meta-analysis was conducted after a systematic search of Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials, CINAHL, and ISI Web of Science, and manual examination of references in selected articles and conference abstracts of key orthopedic journals. Methodological quality and abstracted relevant data were evaluated. In addition to analysis of bone mineral density (BMD), we also conducted systematic analysis of clinically relevant outcomes and bone biochemical markers.
Seventeen trials involving a total of 781 patients were assessed. Significantly less periprosthetic bone loss occurred in the BP-treated group than in the control group at 6 and 12 months (p < 0.0001). This protective effect was not noted at 3 months (p = 0.11) nor from 24-72 months (p = 0.14). The efficacy of BPs in the gender balance, shorter duration, and the non-nitrogenous BPs groups was no different from that for controls. Biochemical bone markers were suppressed in the BPs group. However, clinically relevant outcomes in the BPs group and controls were similar at all times.
The overall moderate-quality evidence from the RCTs confirmed the significant mid-term efficacy of BPs on periprosthetic bone loss after joint arthroplasty. Long-term efficacy of BPs was not observed, and the therapy was of more benefit to women, especially postmenopausal women. To achieve better efficacy, nitrogenous BPs and long duration of treatment may be recommended.
人工关节周围骨丢失在关节置换术后很常见,可能导致骨松动并致使假体固定失败。之前的两项荟萃分析证实了双膦酸盐(BPs)在预防关节置换术后骨丢失方面的中期效果。为了确定关节置换术后BPs的长期疗效和性别差异,我们基于17项随机对照试验(RCTs),纳入781例患者进行荟萃分析,以评估BPs的效果。
在系统检索Medline、Embase、Cochrane协作网临床对照试验中央注册库、CINAHL以及ISI科学网之后,进行荟萃分析,并人工查阅所选文章及主要骨科期刊会议摘要中的参考文献。评估方法学质量并提取相关数据。除了分析骨密度(BMD)外,我们还对临床相关结局和骨生化标志物进行了系统分析。
共评估了17项试验,涉及781例患者。在6个月和12个月时,BP治疗组的人工关节周围骨丢失明显少于对照组(p < 0.0001)。在3个月时未观察到这种保护作用(p = 0.11),在24至72个月时也未观察到(p = 0.14)。BPs在性别均衡、疗程较短以及非含氮BPs组中的疗效与对照组无异。BPs组的骨生化标志物受到抑制。然而,BPs组和对照组在所有时间点的临床相关结局相似。
随机对照试验的总体中等质量证据证实了BPs对关节置换术后人工关节周围骨丢失具有显著的中期疗效。未观察到BPs的长期疗效,且该疗法对女性,尤其是绝经后女性更有益。为了获得更好的疗效,可能推荐使用含氮BPs和较长的治疗疗程。