Cohen T J, Liem L B
Cardiology Division, Stanford University Medical Center, Calif.
Circulation. 1990 Aug;82(2):394-406. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.82.2.394.
Current automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators detect tachyarrhythmias primarily by rate-only algorithms and cannot adequately distinguish hemodynamically stable from unstable tachyarrhythmias. The responses of right atrial (mean) and right ventricular pressures (mean, systolic, diastolic, and pulse) to 64 induced and paced supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias were studied in 10 patients (left ventricular ejection fraction of 32 +/- 6%) to develop an algorithm capable of differentiating stable from unstable rhythms. Tachyarrhythmias were defined as hemodynamically unstable when mean arterial pressure decreased by 25 mm Hg or more during 15 seconds. Mean right atrial, right ventricular systolic, and right ventricular pulse pressures were found to be useful in distinguishing the hemodynamic significance of a tachyarrhythmia. A combined detection algorithm was developed that identified a hemodynamically unstable rhythm when the heart rate was 150 beats/min or more and mean right atrial pressure increased by 4 mm Hg or more and right ventricular systolic pressure decreased by 5 mm Hg or more during 15 seconds. This algorithm was then applied to the next 20 consecutive patients (left ventricular ejection fraction of 34 +/- 4%) and compared with the current rate-only algorithm (heart rate of 150 beats/min or more) in 143 tachyarrhythmias, and the sensitivity and specificity for detection of hemodynamically unstable tachyarrhythmias were determined. The rate-only detection algorithm had 100% sensitivity but only 68% specificity for detection of unstable tachyarrhythmias, whereas the combined rate-mean right atrial pressure-right ventricular systolic pressure detection algorithm had sensitivity and specificity of 100%. Therefore, the performance of an antitachycardia system may be significantly improved by detection algorithms that integrate hemodynamic and rate criteria.
目前的自动植入式心脏复律除颤器主要通过仅基于心率的算法来检测快速性心律失常,无法充分区分血流动力学稳定和不稳定的快速性心律失常。在10例患者(左心室射血分数为32±6%)中,研究了右心房(平均)和右心室压力(平均、收缩压、舒张压和脉压)对64次诱发和起搏的室上性及室性快速性心律失常的反应,以开发一种能够区分稳定和不稳定心律的算法。当平均动脉压在15秒内下降25毫米汞柱或更多时,快速性心律失常被定义为血流动力学不稳定。发现平均右心房、右心室收缩压和右心室脉压有助于区分快速性心律失常的血流动力学意义。开发了一种联合检测算法,当心率为150次/分钟或更高,且平均右心房压力在15秒内升高4毫米汞柱或更多,右心室收缩压下降5毫米汞柱或更多时,识别出血流动力学不稳定的心律。然后将该算法应用于接下来连续的20例患者(左心室射血分数为34±4%),并在143次快速性心律失常中与当前仅基于心率的算法(心率为150次/分钟或更高)进行比较,确定检测血流动力学不稳定快速性心律失常的敏感性和特异性。仅基于心率的检测算法检测不稳定快速性心律失常的敏感性为100%,但特异性仅为68%,而联合心率-平均右心房压力-右心室收缩压检测算法的敏感性和特异性均为100%。因此,通过整合血流动力学和心率标准的检测算法,抗心动过速系统的性能可能会得到显著改善。