van den Heuvel Jaap, Niemeijer Gerard C, Does Ronald J M M
Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2013;26(3):269-78. doi: 10.1108/09526861311311454.
Current health care quality performance indicators appear to be inadequate to inform the public to make the right choices. The aim of this paper is to define a framework and an organizational setting in which valid and reliable healthcare information can be produced to inform the general public about healthcare quality.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: To improve health care quality information, the paper explores the analogy between financial accounting, which aims to produce valid and reliable information to support companies informing their shareholders and stakeholders, and healthcare aiming to inform future patients about healthcare quality. Based on this analogy, the authors suggest a measurement framework and an organizational setting to produce healthcare information.
The authors suggest a five-quality element framework to structure quality reporting. The authors also indicate the best way to report each type of quality, comparing performance indicators with certification/accreditation. Health gain is the most relevant quality indicator to inform the public, but this information is the most difficult to obtain. Finally, the organizational setting, comparable to financial accounting, required to provide valid, reliable and objective information on healthcare quality is described.
Framework elements should be tested in quantitative studies or case studies, such as a performance indicator's relative value compared to accreditation/certification. There are, however, elements that can be implemented right away such as third party validation of healthcare information produced by healthcare institutions.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Given the money spent on healthcare worldwide, valid and reliable healthcare quality information's value can never be overestimated. It can justify delivering "expensive healthcare, but also points the way to savings by stopping useless healthcare. Valid and reliable information puts the patient in the driver's seat and enables him or her to make the right decision when choosing their healthcare provider.
当前的医疗保健质量绩效指标似乎不足以让公众做出正确选择。本文旨在定义一个框架和一种组织架构,以便能够产生有效且可靠的医疗保健信息,从而让公众了解医疗保健质量。
设计/方法/途径:为了改进医疗保健质量信息,本文探讨了财务会计(旨在产生有效且可靠的信息以支持公司向股东和利益相关者通报情况)与旨在向未来患者通报医疗保健质量的医疗保健之间的类比关系。基于这种类比,作者提出了一个用于生成医疗保健信息的衡量框架和一种组织架构。
作者提出了一个包含五个质量要素的框架来构建质量报告。作者还指出了报告每种质量类型的最佳方式,将绩效指标与认证/认可进行比较。健康收益是向公众通报情况时最相关的质量指标,但这类信息最难获取。最后,描述了提供关于医疗保健质量的有效、可靠和客观信息所需的类似于财务会计的组织架构。
框架要素应在定量研究或案例研究中进行测试,例如将绩效指标与认证/认可进行比较时其相对价值。然而,有些要素可以立即实施,比如对医疗机构产生的医疗保健信息进行第三方验证。
原创性/价值:鉴于全球在医疗保健方面的支出,有效且可靠的医疗保健质量信息的价值再怎么高估都不为过。它可以证明提供“昂贵的医疗保健”是合理的,但也指出了通过停止无用的医疗保健来节省开支的途径。有效且可靠的信息让患者掌握主动权,使他们在选择医疗服务提供者时能够做出正确的决定。