• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2000 年后根治性前列腺切除术适应证和肿瘤学结局的变化——2000 年至 2009 年间 1268 例行根治性前列腺切除术日本患者的数据。

Changes in indications and oncological outcomes of radical prostatectomy after 2000--data from 1268 Japanese patients treated with radical prostatectomy between 2000 and 2009.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug;43(8):821-6. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyt072. Epub 2013 May 31.

DOI:10.1093/jjco/hyt072
PMID:23729494
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to characterize trends in indications for and oncological outcomes of radical prostatectomy after 2000.

METHODS

Data from 1268 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy without neoadjuvant therapy between 2000 and 2009 at four urological centers in Japan were retrospectively reviewed. Changes in age at radical prostatectomy, prostate-specific antigen level, biopsy Gleason score, clinical T stage, D'Amico risk classification, organ-confined disease and tumor volume in surgical specimens were analyzed over time.

RESULTS

The median age at radical prostatectomy decreased from 68 years in 2000-2 to 65 years in 2009 (P < 0.001). Approximately 63.3% of patients were ≥65 years old, and 31.4% of patients were ≥70 years old during the whole study period. The median prostate-specific antigen level decreased from 8.61 ng/ml in 2000-2 to 6.90 ng/ml in 2009 (P < 0.001). The rate of organ-confined disease increased from 52.8% in 2000-2 to 72.5% in 2009 (P = 0.004). The median tumor volume decreased from 1.70 cc in 2000-2 to 1.28 cc in 2009 (P = 0.017). The proportion of biopsy Gleason score 7 increased from 40.6% in 2000-2 to 60.1% in 2009 (P < 0.001), and the proportion of the intermediate-risk group increased from 39.5% in 2000-2 to 59.5% in 2009 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Age at radical prostatectomy for men with localized prostate cancer was higher in Japan than in the USA or Europe. Prostate-specific antigen, non-organ-confined disease and tumor volume decreased during the study period, whereas Gleason score 7 and intermediate-risk disease increased during the study period. This information enables comparison of outcomes between various treatments, between various geographic regions and between various time periods.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述 2000 年后根治性前列腺切除术适应证和肿瘤学结果的变化趋势。

方法

回顾性分析了 2000 年至 2009 年在日本 4 个泌尿外科中心接受无新辅助治疗的根治性前列腺切除术的 1268 例患者的数据。分析了随时间推移的根治性前列腺切除术年龄、前列腺特异性抗原水平、活检 Gleason 评分、临床 T 分期、D'Amico 危险分层、器官局限性疾病和手术标本肿瘤体积的变化。

结果

根治性前列腺切除术的中位年龄从 2000-2 年的 68 岁降至 2009 年的 65 岁(P<0.001)。在整个研究期间,约 63.3%的患者年龄≥65 岁,31.4%的患者年龄≥70 岁。前列腺特异性抗原水平中位数从 2000-2 年的 8.61ng/ml 降至 2009 年的 6.90ng/ml(P<0.001)。器官局限性疾病的比例从 2000-2 年的 52.8%增加到 2009 年的 72.5%(P=0.004)。肿瘤体积中位数从 2000-2 年的 1.70cc 降至 2009 年的 1.28cc(P=0.017)。活检 Gleason 评分 7 的比例从 2000-2 年的 40.6%增加到 2009 年的 60.1%(P<0.001),中间风险组的比例从 2000-2 年的 39.5%增加到 2009 年的 59.5%(P<0.001)。

结论

与美国或欧洲相比,日本接受局限性前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术的患者年龄更高。研究期间,前列腺特异性抗原、非器官局限性疾病和肿瘤体积减少,而 Gleason 评分 7 和中间风险疾病增加。这些信息使我们能够在不同治疗方法、不同地理区域和不同时间段之间比较结果。

相似文献

1
Changes in indications and oncological outcomes of radical prostatectomy after 2000--data from 1268 Japanese patients treated with radical prostatectomy between 2000 and 2009.2000 年后根治性前列腺切除术适应证和肿瘤学结局的变化——2000 年至 2009 年间 1268 例行根治性前列腺切除术日本患者的数据。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug;43(8):821-6. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyt072. Epub 2013 May 31.
2
Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.低危前列腺癌患者符合前列腺癌国际主动监测标准行根治性前列腺切除术的病理和生化结局。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(6):914-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11658.x. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
3
Long-term oncological outcome and risk stratification in men with high-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术治疗高危前列腺癌患者的长期肿瘤学结果和风险分层。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun;42(6):541-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hys043. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
4
The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)密度预测初始前列腺活检和前列腺切除术中 Gleason 评分升级的能力随着肿瘤分级的增加而降低,这是由于单位肿瘤体积的 PSA 分泌减少所致。
BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(1):36-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10681.x. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
5
Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors.临床分期为T1c与T2的前列腺腺癌根治性前列腺切除术的病理参数:病理分期降低及移行区肿瘤检出率增加。
J Urol. 2002 Aug;168(2):519-24.
6
Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术是治疗标本中存在高病理 Gleason 评分前列腺癌的有效方法。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):723-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11114.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
7
Does the tertiary Gleason pattern influence the PSA progression-free interval after retropubic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer?对于局限性前列腺癌,经耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后,Gleason分级三分法模式是否会影响无前列腺特异抗原(PSA)进展生存期?
Eur Urol. 2005 Oct;48(4):572-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.06.003.
8
Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.使用基于前列腺特异性抗原密度和活检Gleason评分的新型风险分组系统改善根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的风险分层。
J Urol. 2002 Jul;168(1):110-5.
9
Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.辅助治疗初治患者根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性对前列腺特异抗原失败的影响。
BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1748-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09728.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
10
Reassessment of the risk factors for biochemical recurrence in D'Amico intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated using radical prostatectomy.对采用根治性前列腺切除术治疗的达米科中度风险前列腺癌生化复发危险因素的重新评估。
Int J Urol. 2015 Nov;22(11):1029-35. doi: 10.1111/iju.12898. Epub 2015 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Therapeutic results in elderly patients with prostate cancer: chronological comparison in a single community hospital.老年前列腺癌患者的治疗结果:单一社区医院的时间顺序比较
J Rural Med. 2016;11(2):59-62. doi: 10.2185/jrm.2916. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
2
Controversies associated with the evaluation of elderly men with localized prostate cancer when considering radical prostatectomy.在考虑根治性前列腺切除术时,对老年局限性前列腺癌男性患者进行评估所涉及的争议。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct;19(5):793-9. doi: 10.1007/s10147-014-0738-7. Epub 2014 Aug 26.