• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不精确轮廓的使用与滥用:通过计算和绘制置信区间说明的一些陷阱。

Use and abuse of imprecision profiles: some pitfalls illustrated by computing and plotting confidence intervals.

作者信息

Sadler W A, Smith M H

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand.

出版信息

Clin Chem. 1990 Jul;36(7):1346-50.

PMID:2372950
Abstract

Published estimates of the imprecision characteristics of immunoassays are often based on quantities of data that seem to be inadequate. The increasing use of imprecision profiles has not necessarily improved the situation. We describe and illustrate a method of computing 95% confidence intervals for profiles estimated directly from replicated assay results. The data used were chosen to mimic the sort of data that are typically available in practice, either within laboratories or from external quality-assessment programs. Use of confidence intervals is an effective pictorial way of incorporating information about the quantity and the distribution of the data used for estimation. This is in keeping with an important property of imprecision profile plots: potentially complex information is summarized in a readily comprehensible way. A computer program is available for estimating and plotting profiles and their 95% confidence intervals.

摘要

已发表的免疫分析不精密度特征估计值往往基于似乎不充分的数据量。不精密度图谱的使用日益增加,但情况未必得到改善。我们描述并举例说明了一种根据重复分析结果直接计算图谱95%置信区间的方法。所使用的数据旨在模拟实验室内部或外部质量评估计划中通常可获得的数据类型。使用置信区间是纳入有关用于估计的数据数量和分布信息的一种有效直观方式。这与不精密度图谱的一个重要特性相符:潜在的复杂信息以易于理解的方式进行了总结。有一个计算机程序可用于估计和绘制图谱及其95%置信区间。

相似文献

1
Use and abuse of imprecision profiles: some pitfalls illustrated by computing and plotting confidence intervals.不精确轮廓的使用与滥用:通过计算和绘制置信区间说明的一些陷阱。
Clin Chem. 1990 Jul;36(7):1346-50.
2
A method for direct estimation of imprecision profiles, with reference to immunoassay data.一种参照免疫分析数据直接估计不精密度曲线的方法。
Clin Chem. 1988 Jun;34(6):1058-61.
3
A computer program for estimating imprecision characteristics of immunoassays.
Comput Biomed Res. 1990 Apr;23(2):105-14. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(90)90010-a.
4
Improved confidence intervals for the linkage disequilibrium method for estimating effective population size.用于估计有效种群大小的连锁不平衡方法的改进置信区间。
Heredity (Edinb). 2016 Oct;117(4):217-23. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2016.19. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
5
Estimating imprecision profiles in biochemical analysis.评估生化分析中的不精密度概况。
Clin Chim Acta. 1998 Oct;277(2):107-25. doi: 10.1016/s0009-8981(98)00093-x.
6
Interval estimation by simulation as an alternative to and extension of confidence intervals.通过模拟进行区间估计,作为置信区间的替代方法和扩展。
Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Dec;33(6):1389-97. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh276. Epub 2004 Aug 19.
7
Error models for immunoassays.免疫测定的误差模型。
Ann Clin Biochem. 2008 Sep;45(Pt 5):481-5. doi: 10.1258/acb.2008.007230.
8
Confidence interval estimation for number of patient-years needed to treat.治疗所需患者年数的置信区间估计。
Pharm Stat. 2014 Nov-Dec;13(6):403-9. doi: 10.1002/pst.1650. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
9
Bootstrap-type confidence intervals for quantiles of the survival distribution.生存分布分位数的自助法置信区间。
Stat Med. 2001 Jun 15;20(11):1693-702. doi: 10.1002/sim.709.
10
Estimation of imprecision in immunoassay quality assessment programmes.免疫测定质量评估程序中不精密度的估计
Ann Clin Biochem. 1987 Jan;24 ( Pt 1):98-106. doi: 10.1177/000456328702400115.

引用本文的文献

1
Uncertainty of Measurement and Heteroscedasticity.测量不确定度与异方差性
EJIFCC. 2003 Apr 3;14(1):37-39. eCollection 2003 Apr.
2
Evaluation of pharmacokinetic studies: is it useful to take into account concentrations below the limit of quantification?
Pharm Res. 1996 Jun;13(6):839-45. doi: 10.1023/a:1016088609005.
3
Estimating imprecision of radioassays and related procedures: some considerations.
Eur J Nucl Med. 1991;18(11):863-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02258450.