Salem Dalia A, Abd El-Aziz Sherin M
Clinical Pathology Department, Hematology Unit, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt.
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2012 Jun;28(2):89-96. doi: 10.1007/s12288-011-0110-2. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
Acute leukemia (AL) displays characteristic patterns of antigen expression, which facilitate their identification and proper classification. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic usefulness of commonly used immune-markers for immunophenotyping of AL and to define the best immune-markers to be used for proper diagnosis and classification of AL. Besides, to recognize the frequency of different AL subtypes and the antigen expression profile in our Egyptian patients. We retrospectively analyzed the immunophenotypic data of 164 de novo AL patients from our institution during 2009 and 2010. Among these patients, 68.9% were classified as acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) while 31.1% classified as acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The commonest FAB subtype in AML group was AML-M4/5 (34.5%) which may differ from most published data. As regard ALL, there were 74.5% with B-ALL and 25.5% with T-ALL. It was found that combined use of HLADR and CD34 was much more helpful in distinguishing APL from non-APL AML than either of these antigens alone. It was found that cCD79a and CD19 were the most sensitive marker for B-ALL while cCD3, CD7 and CD5 were the most sensitive antigens for T-ALL. Our analysis of AL phenotypes proved that employed antibody panels are adequate for proper diagnosis and classification of AL. Flowcytometry was found to be especially useful in the identification of AML-M0 and differentiation of APL from non-APL AML. Immunophenotyping results and FAB classification of our AL patients were comparable to internationally published studies apart from predominance of AML-M4/5 and more frequent APL.
急性白血病(AL)呈现出特征性的抗原表达模式,这有助于其识别和正确分类。本研究的目的是评估常用免疫标志物对AL免疫表型分析的诊断价值,并确定用于AL正确诊断和分类的最佳免疫标志物。此外,还要了解埃及患者中不同AL亚型的频率及抗原表达谱。我们回顾性分析了2009年至2010年我院164例初发AL患者的免疫表型数据。在这些患者中,68.9%被分类为急性髓系白血病(AML),而31.1%被分类为急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)。AML组最常见的FAB亚型是AML-M4/5(34.5%),这可能与大多数已发表的数据不同。对于ALL,74.5%为B-ALL,25.5%为T-ALL。研究发现,联合使用HLADR和CD34在区分APL与非APL AML方面比单独使用这两种抗原中的任何一种都更有帮助。研究发现,胞质CD79a和CD19是B-ALL最敏感的标志物,而胞质CD3、CD7和CD5是T-ALL最敏感的抗原。我们对AL表型的分析证明,所采用的抗体组合足以对AL进行正确的诊断和分类。流式细胞术在AML-M0的识别以及APL与非APL AML的鉴别中特别有用。除了AML-M4/5占优势和APL更常见外,我们AL患者的免疫表型分析结果和FAB分类与国际发表的研究结果具有可比性。