Program for Recovery and Community Health, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06513, USA.
Psychol Serv. 2013 May;10(2):241-9. doi: 10.1037/a0030816.
Permanent supported housing has increasingly been identified as a central approach to helping homeless individuals with disabilities exit from homelessness. Given that one third or more of homeless individuals actively use substances, it is important to determine the extent to which individuals who report using alcohol and/or drugs at the time of housing benefit from such programs. The current study examines data from the evaluation of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development-Veterans Affairs (HUD-VA) Supported Housing (HUD-VASH) program to determine differences in housing and clinical outcomes among participants with two different levels of active alcohol or drug use at time of housing entry. Whereas veterans with 1-15 days of active use and 15-30 days of active use had significantly more days homeless than abstainers, albeit with small effect sizes (.06 and .19, respectively), there were no significant differences in days housed or days in institutions. Interaction analysis suggests that the highest frequency substance users who spent time in residential treatment prior to housing had the poorest housing outcomes, while those who were not in residential treatment had outcomes comparable to abstainers. Although active substance users clearly benefit from supportive housing with small differences in outcomes from abstainers, high frequency substance users who were admitted to residential treatment before housing placement, may be an especially vulnerable population.
永久性支持性住房越来越被认为是帮助残疾无家可归者摆脱无家可归的核心方法。鉴于三分之一或更多的无家可归者积极使用物质,确定在住房时报告使用酒精和/或药物的个人是否受益于此类计划非常重要。本研究利用美国住房和城市发展部-退伍军人事务部(HUD-VA)支持性住房(HUD-VASH)计划评估的数据,确定在住房时具有两种不同活跃酒精或药物使用水平的参与者在住房和临床结果方面的差异。虽然在住房时使用 1-15 天和使用 15-30 天的退伍军人比戒酒者有更多的无家可归天数,但差异很小(分别为.06 和.19),入住天数或入住机构天数没有差异。交互分析表明,在住房之前曾在住院治疗中度过时间的最高频率物质使用者的住房结果最差,而未接受住院治疗的物质使用者的结果与戒酒者相当。尽管活跃的物质使用者显然受益于支持性住房,但其结果与戒酒者的差异很小,但在住房安置之前被收容在住院治疗中的高频率物质使用者可能是一个特别脆弱的群体。