Suppr超能文献

现代微创面部提升术:它取代传统入路方法了吗?

The modern minimally invasive face lift: has it replaced the traditional access approach?

作者信息

Jacono Andrew A, Rousso Joseph J

机构信息

Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, NY, USA.

出版信息

Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2013 May;21(2):171-89. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2013.02.002.

Abstract

Because modern facelift patients desire a less-invasive approach or minimally invasive approach to reduce visible scarring and decrease the recovery phase, achieving the surgeon's goal of optimal, reliable, and long-term aesthetic results with few complications becomes a challenge. The authors use the terms minimal access and traditional access to describe rhytidectomy approaches based solely on incision size. A short-incision, minimal-access approach with a deep-plane extended dissection is presented. A preoperative physical examination maneuver to evaluate a patient's candidacy for a minimal-access approach and guidelines for when to include platysmaplasty with the procedure to further improve cervicomental contour are described.

摘要

由于现代面部提升术患者期望采用侵入性较小或微创的方法来减少可见疤痕并缩短恢复期,因此在并发症极少的情况下实现外科医生的最佳、可靠和长期美学效果的目标成为一项挑战。作者使用“微创入路”和“传统入路”这两个术语来仅基于切口大小描述除皱术入路。本文介绍了一种采用深平面扩展剥离的短切口、微创入路。描述了一种术前体格检查手法,用于评估患者是否适合采用微创入路,以及何时在手术中加入颈阔肌成形术以进一步改善颌颈轮廓的指导原则。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验