Kessler P, Steinfeldt T, Gogarten W, Schwemmer U, Büttner J, Graf B M, Volk T
Abteilung für Anästhesiologie, Intensiv- und Schmerzmedizin, Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Friedrichsheim gGmbH, Marienburgstr. 2, 60528 Frankfurt, Deutschland.
Anaesthesist. 2013 Jun;62(6):483-8. doi: 10.1007/s00101-013-2190-x.
Nerve injury after peripheral regional anesthesia is rare and is not usually permanent. Some authors believe that inducing peripheral nerve blocks in patients during general anesthesia or analgosedation adds an additional risk factor for neuronal damage. This is based on published case reports showing that there is a positive correlation between paresthesia experienced during regional anesthesia and subsequent nerve injury. Therefore, many sources recommend that regional nerve blocks should only be performed in awake or lightly sedated patients, at least in adults. However, there is no scientific basis for this recommendation. Furthermore, there is no proof that regional anesthesia performed in patients under general anesthesia or deep sedation bears a greater risk than in awake or lightly sedated patients. Currently anesthesiologists are free to follow personal preferences in this matter as there is no good evidence favoring one approach over the other. The risk of systemic toxicity of local anesthetic agents is not higher in patients who receive regional anesthesia under general anesthesia or deep sedation. Finally, in children and uncooperative adults the administration of peripheral nerve blocks under general anesthesia or deep sedation is widely accepted.
外周区域麻醉后神经损伤很少见,且通常并非永久性损伤。一些作者认为,在全身麻醉或镇痛镇静期间对患者实施外周神经阻滞会增加神经元损伤的额外风险因素。这是基于已发表的病例报告,这些报告表明区域麻醉期间出现的感觉异常与随后的神经损伤之间存在正相关。因此,许多资料建议区域神经阻滞仅应在清醒或轻度镇静的患者中进行,至少在成人中如此。然而,这一建议并无科学依据。此外,没有证据表明在全身麻醉或深度镇静的患者中实施区域麻醉比在清醒或轻度镇静的患者中风险更大。目前,由于没有充分证据支持一种方法优于另一种方法,麻醉医生在这个问题上可以自由遵循个人偏好。在全身麻醉或深度镇静下接受区域麻醉的患者中,局部麻醉药的全身毒性风险并不更高。最后,在儿童和不合作的成人中,在全身麻醉或深度镇静下实施外周神经阻滞已被广泛接受。