Giaufré E, Dalens B, Gombert A
Service de Chirurgie Pédiatrique, Fondation-Hôpital Saint-Joseph, Marseille, France.
Anesth Analg. 1996 Nov;83(5):904-12. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199611000-00003.
We report the results of a prospective study on the practice of pediatric regional anesthesia by the French-Language Society of Pediatric Anesthesiologists (ADARPEF) during the period from May 1, 1993 to April 30, 1994. This study was designed to provide data concerning the epidemiology of regional anesthesia and its complications in a totally anonymous way. Data from 85,412 procedures, 61,003 pure general anesthetics and 24,409 anesthetics including a regional block, were prospectively collected. Central blocks (15,013), most of which were caudals, accounted for more than 60% of all regional anesthetics. Peripheral nerve blocks and local anesthesia techniques represented only 38% of regional blocks and Bier block was used only 69 times. Central and peripheral nerve blocks were performed in all pediatric age groups with some intergroup differences. Most blocks were performed under light general anesthesia (89%), confirming the fact that regional anesthetics are used as techniques of analgesia rather than anesthesia. Complications were rate (25 incidents involving 24 patients) and minor, and did not result in any sequelae or medicolegal action. Peripheral nerve blocks and local anesthesia techniques were generally safe. The overall complication rate of regional anesthesia was 0.9 per 1000, but because all complications occurred with central blocks, the complication rate of central blocks is in fact 1.5 per 1000 with significant variations in different age groups. This prospective study, based on a large and representative series of pediatric anesthetics, establishes the safety of regional anesthesia in children of all ages. It provides new insights on the practice of regional blocks and reveals that complications are rare and minor as they occur most often in the operating room and are readily managed by experienced anesthesiologists with resuscitative equipment at hand. The extremely low incidence of complications (zero in this study) after peripheral nerve blocks should encourage pediatric anesthesiologists to use them more often when they are appropriate, in the place of a central block.
我们报告了法语区儿科麻醉医师协会(ADARPEF)在1993年5月1日至1994年4月30日期间进行的一项关于儿科区域麻醉实践的前瞻性研究结果。本研究旨在以完全匿名的方式提供有关区域麻醉流行病学及其并发症的数据。前瞻性收集了85412例手术、61003例单纯全身麻醉以及24409例包含区域阻滞的麻醉的数据。中枢阻滞(15013例),其中大部分为骶管阻滞,占所有区域麻醉的60%以上。外周神经阻滞和局部麻醉技术仅占区域阻滞的38%,而静脉局部麻醉仅使用了69次。中枢和外周神经阻滞在所有儿科年龄组中均有实施,且存在一些组间差异。大多数阻滞在浅全身麻醉下进行(89%),这证实了区域麻醉被用作镇痛技术而非麻醉技术这一事实。并发症发生率较低(25起事件涉及24名患者)且为轻微并发症,未导致任何后遗症或医疗法律诉讼。外周神经阻滞和局部麻醉技术总体上是安全的。区域麻醉的总体并发症发生率为每1000例0.9例,但由于所有并发症均发生在中枢阻滞中,实际上中枢阻滞的并发症发生率为每1000例1.5例,且在不同年龄组中有显著差异。这项基于大量且具有代表性的儿科麻醉病例系列的前瞻性研究,确立了各年龄段儿童区域麻醉的安全性。它为区域阻滞的实践提供了新的见解,并揭示并发症很少见且为轻微并发症,因为它们大多发生在手术室,并且经验丰富的麻醉医师在手头有复苏设备的情况下很容易进行处理。外周神经阻滞后并发症的极低发生率(本研究中为零)应鼓励儿科麻醉医师在合适的时候更多地使用外周神经阻滞,以替代中枢阻滞。