Department of Neurology, Stroke Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35(5):461-8. doi: 10.1159/000350201. Epub 2013 May 31.
Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) given within 4.5 h of symptom onset is accepted as the standard treatment of ischemic stroke. Persistent occlusion of cerebral arteries despite intravenous thrombolysis and unremitting neurologic deficits lead us to consider additional intra-arterial approaches. The aim of this study was to elucidate the potential of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI performed during or immediately after intravenous thrombolysis for predicting clinical outcomes of subsequent intra-arterial thrombolysis.
With a prospective stroke registry database of patients hospitalized in our institution from January 2004 to February 2010, we identified ischemic stroke patients with the following conditions: (1) presentation within 2.5 h of onset, (2) treated with intravenous tPA based on brain CT, (3) persistent occlusion on subsequent MRI/MR angiography, including a FLAIR sequence, and (4) eventually treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis. Demographic, clinical and laboratory findings including initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), follow-up NIHSS at the 7th day or discharge, modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at 3 months, and symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation were captured. FLAIR images were reviewed by 2 investigators blinded to clinical information independently and dichotomized into the absence and presence of FLAIR change within the diffusion-restriction lesions.
Of the 57 patients who met these conditions, FLAIR-hyperintense lesions (FHL) were observed in 32 (56.1%). The FHL-negative group was 69.1 ± 12.1 years old on average and the FHL-positive group 67.3 ± 11.0 years old. In both groups, hypertension was the most common vascular risk factor, cardioembolic stroke was the most common subtype, and distal middle cerebral artery was the most common site of occlusion. The incidence of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation was 4.0% in the FHL-negative group and 9.4% in the FHL-positive group (p = 0.62). NIHSS scores of 0-1 on the 7th day of hospitalization or at discharge were observed in 36% of the FHL-negative group and in 9.4% of the FHL-positive group; mRS scores of 0-1 at 3 months was 32% in the FHL-negative group and 21% in the FHL-positive group. An ordinal logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of FHL was associated with higher 7-day NIHSS scores (adjusted for relevant covariates) but not with higher 3-month mRS scores.
This study suggests that the FHL might be used as imaging biomarker to predict outcomes for additional intra-arterial thrombolysis in patients treated with intravenous tPA.
症状发作后 4.5 小时内给予静脉组织型纤溶酶原激活物(tPA)被认为是缺血性脑卒中的标准治疗方法。尽管进行了静脉溶栓治疗,但仍存在大脑动脉持续闭塞和持续的神经功能缺损,这促使我们考虑额外的动脉内治疗方法。本研究旨在探讨在静脉溶栓治疗期间或之后进行的液体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)MRI 预测随后动脉内溶栓治疗的临床结局的潜力。
通过对 2004 年 1 月至 2010 年 2 月在我院住院的患者进行前瞻性卒中登记数据库,我们确定了符合以下条件的缺血性脑卒中患者:(1)发病 2.5 小时内就诊,(2)基于脑 CT 接受静脉 tPA 治疗,(3)随后 MRI/MR 血管造影显示持续闭塞,包括 FLAIR 序列,(4)最终接受动脉内溶栓治疗。记录患者的人口统计学、临床和实验室资料,包括初始国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)、第 7 天或出院时的随访 NIHSS、3 个月时的改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)评分以及症状性出血性转化。由 2 名不知临床资料的研究者独立对 FLAIR 图像进行评估,并分为 FLAIR 病变内无 FLAIR 改变和存在 FLAIR 改变两组。
在符合这些条件的 57 名患者中,有 32 名(56.1%)观察到 FLAIR 高信号病变(FHL)。FHL 阴性组的平均年龄为 69.1±12.1 岁,FHL 阳性组为 67.3±11.0 岁。在两组中,高血压是最常见的血管危险因素,心源性栓塞性卒中是最常见的亚型,大脑中动脉远端是最常见的闭塞部位。FHL 阴性组症状性出血性转化的发生率为 4.0%,FHL 阳性组为 9.4%(p=0.62)。FHL 阴性组有 36%的患者在住院第 7 天或出院时 NIHSS 评分为 0-1 分,FHL 阳性组为 9.4%;FHL 阴性组有 32%的患者在 3 个月时 mRS 评分为 0-1 分,FHL 阳性组为 21%。有序逻辑回归分析显示,FHL 的存在与较高的第 7 天 NIHSS 评分相关(经相关协变量调整),但与 3 个月 mRS 评分无关。
本研究提示 FHL 可能作为一种影像学生物标志物,用于预测接受静脉 tPA 治疗的患者进行额外动脉内溶栓治疗的结局。