Njagi Lucy W, Nyaga Phillip N, Bebora Lilly C, Mbuthia Paul G, Minga Uswege M
Department of Veterinary Pathology, Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 29053-00625, Kangemi, Kenya.
ISRN Vet Sci. 2012 Jan 23;2012:253809. doi: 10.5402/2012/253809. Print 2012.
This study was carried out to verify the possibility that ducks are sources of Newcastle disease (ND) virus infection for chickens in mixed flocks. Immunosuppressed (IS) and non immunosuppressed (NIS) birds, at three different antibody levels (medium, low and absent) were used; the titres having been induced through vaccination, and Immunosuppression done using dexamethazone. Each of the 3 respective groups was further divided into 2 groups of about 12 ducks each: one challenged with velogenic ND virus; the other not challenged. Selected ducks from all groups had their antibody titres monitored serially using hemagglutination inhibition test, while two birds from each of the challenged groups were killed and respective tissues processed for ND viral recovery, using chicken embryo fibroblasts. In general, antibody titres of IS and NIS challenged ducks were significantly higher than their unchallenged counterparts (P < 0.05). Non-challenged pre-immunised ducks had a progressive decrease in antibody levels; non-immunised ducks did not seroconvert. Newcastle disease virus was isolated from livers and kidneys of the challenged ducks throughout the experimental period; indicating a possibility of viral excretion, especially when the birds are stressed. It, therefore, provides another possible model of viral circulation within mixed flocks.
本研究旨在验证在混养禽群中,鸭是否为鸡新城疫(ND)病毒感染源的可能性。使用了处于三种不同抗体水平(中等、低和无)的免疫抑制(IS)和非免疫抑制(NIS)禽类;抗体滴度通过疫苗接种诱导产生,免疫抑制则使用地塞米松进行。3个相应组中的每组又进一步分为2组,每组约12只鸭:一组用速发型ND病毒攻毒;另一组不攻毒。使用血凝抑制试验对所有组中选定的鸭的抗体滴度进行连续监测,同时对每个攻毒组的2只鸭进行宰杀,并使用鸡胚成纤维细胞对相应组织进行处理以回收ND病毒。总体而言,IS和NIS攻毒鸭的抗体滴度显著高于未攻毒的对应鸭(P < 0.05)。未攻毒的预先免疫鸭的抗体水平逐渐下降;未免疫鸭未发生血清转化。在整个实验期间,从攻毒鸭的肝脏和肾脏中分离到新城疫病毒;这表明存在病毒排泄的可能性,尤其是在禽类受到应激时。因此,它提供了混养禽群中病毒循环的另一种可能模式。