Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 North Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
BMJ. 2013 Jun 5;346:f2570. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2570.
To investigate whether an intervention to improve treatment of depression in older adults in primary care modified the increased risk of death associated with depression.
Long term follow-up of multi-site practice randomized controlled trial (PROSPECT-Prevention of Suicide in Primary Care Elderly: Collaborative Trial).
20 primary care practices in New York City, Philadelphia, and Pittsburgh, USA, randomized to intervention or usual care.
1226 participants identified between May 1999 and August 2001 through a two stage, age stratified (60-74; ≥ 75 years) depression screening of randomly sampled patients; enrollment included patients who screened positive and a random sample of patients who screened negative.
For two years, a depression care manager worked with primary care physicians in intervention practices to provide algorithm based care for depression, offering psychotherapy, increasing antidepressant dose if indicated, and monitoring symptoms, adverse effects of drugs, and adherence to treatment. This paper reports the long term follow-up.
Mortality risk based on a median follow-up of 98 (range 0.8-116.4) months through 2008.
In baseline clinical interviews, 396 people were classified as having major depression, 203 had clinically significant minor depression, and 627 did not meet criteria for depression. At follow-up, 405 patients had died. Patients with major depression in usual care were more likely to die than were those without depression (hazard ratio 1.90, 95% confidence interval 1.57 to 2.31). In contrast, patients with major depression in intervention practices were at no greater risk than were people without depression (hazard ratio 1.09, 0.83 to 1.44). Patients with major depression in intervention practices, relative to usual care, were 24% less likely to have died (hazard ratio 0.76, 0.57 to 1.00; P=0.05). Preliminary data on cause of death are provided. No significant effect on mortality was found for minor depression.
Older adults with major depression in practices provided with additional resources to intensively manage depression had a mortality risk lower than that observed in usual care and similar to older adults without depression.
Clinical trials NCT00000367.
探讨改善初级保健中老年抑郁症治疗的干预措施是否改变了与抑郁症相关的死亡风险增加。
多地点实践随机对照试验(PROSPECT-预防初级保健老年人自杀:协作试验)的长期随访。
美国纽约市、费城和匹兹堡的 20 个初级保健诊所,随机分配到干预组或常规护理组。
1999 年 5 月至 2001 年 8 月期间,通过两阶段、年龄分层(60-74 岁;≥75 岁)对随机抽样患者进行抑郁筛查,共确定了 1226 名参与者;纳入了筛查阳性的患者和随机筛查阴性的患者。
在两年的时间里,一名抑郁护理经理与干预实践中的初级保健医生合作,为抑郁患者提供基于算法的护理,提供心理治疗,如果有必要增加抗抑郁药的剂量,并监测症状、药物的不良反应和治疗的依从性。本文报告了长期随访结果。
截至 2008 年,中位数随访时间为 98(范围 0.8-116.4)个月的死亡率风险。
在基线临床访谈中,396 人被归类为患有重度抑郁症,203 人患有临床显著的轻度抑郁症,627 人不符合抑郁症标准。随访时,405 名患者死亡。在常规护理中患有重度抑郁症的患者比没有抑郁症的患者更有可能死亡(风险比 1.90,95%置信区间 1.57 至 2.31)。相比之下,在干预实践中患有重度抑郁症的患者与没有抑郁症的患者的风险没有增加(风险比 1.09,0.83 至 1.44)。与常规护理相比,在干预实践中患有重度抑郁症的患者的死亡风险降低了 24%(风险比 0.76,0.57 至 1.00;P=0.05)。提供了初步的死亡原因数据。对于轻度抑郁症,未发现对死亡率有显著影响。
在提供额外资源以强化管理抑郁症的实践中,患有重度抑郁症的老年患者的死亡率风险低于常规护理观察到的风险,与没有抑郁症的老年患者相似。
临床试验 NCT00000367。