Suppr超能文献

右美托咪定对创伤性脑损伤患者镇静及β-内啡肽的影响:与丙泊酚的对比研究

[Effects of dexmedetomidine on sedation and β-endorphin in traumatic brain injury: a comparative study with propofol].

作者信息

Hao Jiang, Luo Ji-shen, Weng Qi, He Yi, Liu Jun, Yang Ming-hao, Bian Ge-yuan, Liu Tao

机构信息

Department of Emergency, Kunming General Hospital, Chengdu Military of PLA, Yunnan, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2013 Jun;25(6):373-6. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2013.06.014.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of dextraldexmede (DEX) and propofol on sedation and β-endorphin (β-EP) in patients with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHODS

Ninety patients with moderate and severe TBI with Glasgow coma score (GCS) 6-13 were randomly divided into three groups according to the order of admission of odd and even numbers. In group A (DEX/+morphine), DEX load 0.5-1.0 μg/kg was injected within 30 minutes, and maintaining at 0.2-0.6 μg×kg⁻¹ × h⁻¹ for 24 hours; and in group B (propofol/+ morphine), propofol load 0.5-2.0 mg/kg was injected within 10 minutes, and maintaining at 1-3 mg×kg⁻¹×h⁻¹ for 72 hours. Patients with poor efficacy were added with morphine intravenously. In group C, intramuscular injection of pethidine and other temporary medication was injected. The comprehensive assessment was conducted according to the Riker sedation and agitation score, combined with the physiological body reaction positive indicator elimination. The vital signs was monitored, and blood white blood cell (WBC) count, blood sugar, cortisol and β-EP before and after administration were determined.

RESULTS

(1) The sedation efficiency rate of the group A, B, C were 84.38% (27/32), 80.64% (25/31), 77.78% (21/27), respectively. The booster dose of morphine in group A was less than that in group B (24 h dosage: 16.23 ± 3.45 mg vs. 21.34 ± 5.55 mg). (2) Blood pressure and heart rate were significantly affected in the group A. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) in 0.5 hour of reaching loading dose in group A was significantly lower than that in group B and C (75.50 ± 9.35 mm Hg vs. 87.90 ± 8.05 mm Hg, 85.70 ± 7.10 mm Hg, both P<0.05). (3) WBC and cortisol levels showed downwards trends after treatment in group A and group B; WBC fell more in the group A compared with group B, cortisol level fell more in group B compared with group A, and the WBC and cortisol level began to decline after 24 hours in group C. (4) There were no significant differences in blood sugar and β-EP levels before and after treatment in group B, but β-EP had an increasing tendency in group A and group C, and the amplification in group C was more obvious than that in group A.

CONCLUSIONS

The sedation efficacy of DEX was superior to propofol in moderate and severe TBI, and was able to control excessive stress response after TBI better, and with more effect on blood pressure. Plasma β-EP was elevated during the early phase of brain injury by DEX, which was considered as its positive role in the regulation of early stress.

摘要

目的

比较右美托咪定(DEX)与丙泊酚对中重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者镇静及β-内啡肽(β-EP)的影响。

方法

90例格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)为6-13分的中重度TBI患者按入院奇偶顺序随机分为三组。A组(DEX/吗啡组),于30分钟内静脉注射负荷剂量DEX 0.5-1.0 μg/kg,随后以0.2-0.6 μg×kg⁻¹×h⁻¹维持24小时;B组(丙泊酚/吗啡组),于10分钟内静脉注射负荷剂量丙泊酚0.5-2.0 mg/kg,随后以1-3 mg×kg⁻¹×h⁻¹维持72小时。疗效欠佳者静脉追加吗啡。C组采用肌内注射哌替啶等临时用药。依据Riker镇静与躁动评分进行综合评估,并结合生理体征反应阳性指标的消除情况。监测生命体征,测定给药前后血白细胞(WBC)计数、血糖、皮质醇及β-EP水平。

结果

(1)A、B、C组的镇静有效率分别为84.38%(27/32)、80.64%(25/31)、77.78%(21/27)。A组吗啡追加剂量少于B组(24小时用量:16.23±3.45 mg对21.34±5.55 mg)。(2)A组血压和心率受到显著影响。A组在达到负荷剂量0.5小时时的平均动脉压(MAP)显著低于B组和C组(75.50±9.35 mmHg对87.90±8.05 mmHg、85.70±7.10 mmHg,均P<0.05)。(3)A组和B组治疗后WBC及皮质醇水平呈下降趋势;A组WBC下降幅度大于B组,B组皮质醇水平下降幅度大于A组,C组WBC和皮质醇水平在24小时后开始下降。(4)B组治疗前后血糖及β-EP水平无显著差异,但A组和C组β-EP有升高趋势,且C组升高幅度大于A组。

结论

在中重度TBI患者中,DEX的镇静效果优于丙泊酚,能更好地控制TBI后的过度应激反应,对血压影响更大。DEX可使脑损伤早期血浆β-EP升高,考虑其在早期应激调节中的积极作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验