Jones Edward L, Dunn Christina L, Townsend Nicole T, Jones Teresa S, Bruce Dunne J, Montero Paul N, Govekar Henry R, Stiegmann Greg V, Robinson Thomas N
Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 East 17th Ave., MS C313, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4016-20. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3032-2. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
The purpose of this study was to compare histologic evidence of thermal injury at the epigastric and umbilical incisions after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed using the monopolar "Bovie" instrument set on the higher voltage coag mode versus the lower voltage blend mode. We hypothesized that the higher voltage coag mode would create more unintended thermal tissue injury at the epigastric trocar's incision.
A prospective blinded randomized controlled trial of patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. Patients were randomized to have their operation performed with the monopolar instrument set at 30 W on either the coag mode or the blend mode. Immediately at the end of the operation, a biopsy sample of skin was obtained from the lower edge of the epigastric incision (through which the monopolar instrument was inserted) and the umbilical incision (through which the camera/telescope was inserted). The outcomes measured were histologic evidence of thermal injury at the epigastric and umbilical incisions (determined by a blinded pathologist).
Forty patients were randomized (20 per group). Baseline demographics in the two groups were similar for age, gender, body mass index, preoperative diagnosis, operative time, and blood loss. Unintentional thermal injury was found at 20 % of epigastric incisions and 35 % of umbilical incisions in the total group. The incidence of thermal injury was higher after operations using the coag mode compared to the blend mode at both the epigastric (35 vs. 5 %; p = 0.044) and umbilical (55 vs. 15 %; p = 0.019) trocar incisions.
Radiofrequency energy from the monopolar Bovie instrument causes unintentional thermal injury to skin adjacent to the epigastric and umbilical trocar incisions. The incidence of thermal injury was reduced by using the lower voltage blend mode compared to the coag mode at both the epigastric and umbilical trocar incisions.
NCT016648060 ( www.clinicaltrials.gov ).
本研究旨在比较在择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术中,使用单极“博维”器械并设置为较高电压凝固模式与较低电压混合模式时,上腹部和脐部切口处热损伤的组织学证据。我们假设较高电压凝固模式会在上腹部套管针切口处造成更多意外的热组织损伤。
对接受择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者进行了一项前瞻性双盲随机对照试验。患者被随机分配,使用单极器械以30W功率在凝固模式或混合模式下进行手术。手术结束后立即从插入单极器械的上腹部切口下缘和插入摄像头/望远镜的脐部切口获取皮肤活检样本。测量的结果是上腹部和脐部切口处热损伤的组织学证据(由一位盲法病理学家确定)。
40例患者被随机分组(每组20例)。两组在年龄、性别、体重指数、术前诊断、手术时间和失血量方面的基线人口统计学特征相似。在整个研究组中,20%的上腹部切口和35%的脐部切口发现了意外热损伤。与混合模式相比,使用凝固模式进行手术后,上腹部(35%对5%;p = 0.044)和脐部(55%对15%;p = 0.019)套管针切口处的热损伤发生率更高。
单极博维器械产生的射频能量会对上腹部和脐部套管针切口附近的皮肤造成意外热损伤。与凝固模式相比,在脐部和上腹部套管针切口处使用较低电压混合模式可降低热损伤的发生率。
NCT016648060(www.clinicaltrials.gov)