• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨锚式助听器植入的微创技术。

A minimally invasive technique for the implantation of bone-anchored hearing devices.

机构信息

Wilson Ear Clinic, Portland, Oregon 97209, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Sep;149(3):473-7. doi: 10.1177/0194599813492946. Epub 2013 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1177/0194599813492946
PMID:23740414
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe and evaluate a novel technique for the implantation of bone conduction hearing devices as compared with a common, conventional technique.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series with chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral otology and neurotology practice.

METHODS

Individuals who underwent the implantation of bone-anchored hearing devices between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2011, were identified. Demographic data, surgical indications, surgical technique used, surgical time, and complications were recorded. Soft tissue complications were graded on the Holgers classification scheme. Group 1 was defined as those undergoing a traditional technique using a dermatome with subcutaneous tissue reduction. Group 2 was defined as those undergoing the described technique for implantation of the coupling hardware with minimal subcutaneous soft tissue reduction.

RESULTS

Forty patients underwent the procedure, with 11 patients comprising group 1 and 29 patients comprising group 2. Group 2 required a shorter operative time (32.3 vs 56.1 minutes, P < .0001). Of patients in group 1, 2 of 11 developed soft tissue complications, whereas 5 of 29 in group 2 developed soft tissue complications (P = 1.000). Most soft tissue complications were reversed with conservative wound care.

CONCLUSION

Surgery was performed faster with similar postoperative outcomes in individuals undergoing implantation of bone-anchored hearing devices using the described technique that necessitated minimal soft tissue reduction.

摘要

目的

与常规技术相比,描述并评估一种新型骨导式听力植入技术。

研究设计

病例系列及图表回顾。

设置

三级转诊耳科学和神经耳科学实践。

方法

确定 2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2011 年 12 月 31 日期间接受骨锚式听力植入的个体。记录人口统计学数据、手术适应证、使用的手术技术、手术时间和并发症。软组织并发症按霍尔斯分类方案分级。第 1 组定义为采用带有皮下组织减少的削皮刀进行传统技术的组;第 2 组定义为采用描述的技术植入耦合硬件且皮下软组织减少最小的组。

结果

40 例患者接受了该手术,其中 11 例患者为第 1 组,29 例患者为第 2 组。第 2 组需要更短的手术时间(32.3 分钟 vs. 56.1 分钟,P <.0001)。第 1 组的 11 例患者中有 2 例发生软组织并发症,而第 2 组的 29 例患者中有 5 例发生软组织并发症(P = 1.000)。大多数软组织并发症经保守伤口护理即可逆转。

结论

与需要最小软组织减少的描述技术相比,在接受骨锚式听力植入的患者中,采用新型技术进行手术可更快,且术后结果相似。

相似文献

1
A minimally invasive technique for the implantation of bone-anchored hearing devices.骨锚式助听器植入的微创技术。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Sep;149(3):473-7. doi: 10.1177/0194599813492946. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
2
Soft tissue overgrowth in bone-anchored hearing aid patients: use of 8.5 mm abutment.骨锚式助听器患者的软组织过度生长:使用8.5毫米基台。
J Laryngol Otol. 2011 Jun;125(6):576-9. doi: 10.1017/S0022215111000090. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
3
Punch and Drill: Implantation of Bone Anchored Hearing Device Through a Minimal Skin Punch Incision Versus Implantation With Dermatome and Soft Tissue Reduction.打孔与钻孔:通过微小皮肤打孔切口植入骨锚式听力装置与使用皮刀及软组织减容植入法的比较
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016 Mar;125(3):199-206. doi: 10.1177/0003489415606447. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
4
Minimal access surgery for implantable bone conduction systems: early experience with the "Sheffield" incision.微创植入式骨导系统手术:“谢菲尔德”切口的早期经验。
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Sep;33(7):1232-4. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318263d780.
5
Simplified bone-anchored hearing aid insertion using a linear incision without soft tissue reduction.使用线性切口且不进行软组织复位的简化骨锚式助听器植入术。
J Laryngol Otol. 2013 Jul;127 Suppl 2:S33-8. doi: 10.1017/S0022215113000741. Epub 2013 May 7.
6
Canal atresia: "surgery or implantable hearing devices? The expert's question is revisited".耳道闭锁:“手术还是可植入式听力设备?专家的问题再探讨”
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Mar;71(3):367-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.09.003. Epub 2006 Dec 29.
7
Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: dermatome versus linear incision technique.经皮骨锚式听力植入手术:皮片刀与线性切口技术
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jan;274(1):109-117. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4210-3. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
8
Bone-anchored hearing aid: a comparison of surgical techniques.骨锚式助听器:手术技术比较。
Otol Neurotol. 2010 Jan;31(1):129-35. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181c29fec.
9
Audiologic and surgical outcomes of a novel, nonpercutaneous, bone conducting hearing implant.新型非经皮骨导听力植入物的听力学和手术效果。
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Jul;34(5):922-6. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31827e60bd.
10
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Osseointegrated Auditory Implants: A Comparison of Linear versus Punch Techniques.骨整合听觉植入物的微创手术:线性技术与冲孔技术的比较
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Jun;152(6):1089-93. doi: 10.1177/0194599815571532. Epub 2015 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The Minimally Invasive Star-Shaped Incision Technique and the Linear Incision Technique With Tissue Preservation for Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices: A Retrospective Cohort Study.用于经皮骨传导装置的微创星形切口技术与保留组织的线性切口技术:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Surg. 2022 Mar 21;9:863997. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.863997. eCollection 2022.
2
Evaluation of a New Drill System for Placement of Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices.一种用于经皮骨传导装置植入的新型钻孔系统的评估
Front Surg. 2022 Mar 21;9:858117. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.858117. eCollection 2022.
3
Punch vs open surgical techniques for placement of bone-anchored hearing implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of skin reactions and operating time.
经皮与开放式手术植入骨锚定式听力植入物的比较:皮肤反应和手术时间的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Sep;278(9):3171-3180. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06511-9. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
4
A Comparison of the Operative Techniques and the Postoperative Complications for Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Implantation.骨锚式助听器植入术的手术技术与术后并发症比较
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Oct;22(4):368-373. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1613685. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
5
Bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: our experience with linear incision and punch techniques.骨锚式听力植入手术:我们采用线性切口和打孔技术的经验。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2018 Jun;38(3):257-263. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1694.
6
Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: linear incision technique with tissue preservation versus linear incision technique with tissue reduction.经皮骨锚定式听力植入手术:保留组织的直线切口技术与组织减少的直线切口技术比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jul;275(7):1737-1747. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5005-5. Epub 2018 May 30.
7
Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery without soft-tissue reduction: up to 42 months of follow-up.不进行软组织缩减的经皮骨锚式听力植入手术:长达42个月的随访
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Oct;35(9):1596-600. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000522.