• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: our experience with linear incision and punch techniques.骨锚式听力植入手术:我们采用线性切口和打孔技术的经验。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2018 Jun;38(3):257-263. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1694.
2
Surgical and audiological results of bone-anchored hearing aids: comparison of two surgical techniques.骨锚式助听器的手术和听力结果:两种手术技术的比较。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jul-Aug;88(4):533-538. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
3
Punch and Drill: Implantation of Bone Anchored Hearing Device Through a Minimal Skin Punch Incision Versus Implantation With Dermatome and Soft Tissue Reduction.打孔与钻孔:通过微小皮肤打孔切口植入骨锚式听力装置与使用皮刀及软组织减容植入法的比较
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016 Mar;125(3):199-206. doi: 10.1177/0003489415606447. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
4
Standardization of the Punch Technique for the Implantation of Bone Anchored Auditory Devices: Evaluation of the MIPS Surgical Set.骨锚定听觉设备植入的冲切技术标准化:MIPS 手术套件的评估。
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Jul;40(6):e631-e635. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002291.
5
Experience with Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery and Linear Incision Approach for Pediatric and Adult Bone Anchored Hearing Implants.小儿及成人骨锚式助听器的微创桥接手术和线性切口入路经验
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020 Apr;129(4):380-387. doi: 10.1177/0003489419891451. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
6
Punch vs open surgical techniques for placement of bone-anchored hearing implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of skin reactions and operating time.经皮与开放式手术植入骨锚定式听力植入物的比较:皮肤反应和手术时间的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Sep;278(9):3171-3180. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06511-9. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
7
Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery compared to the linear incision technique without soft tissue reduction for bone conduction hearing implants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.与不进行软组织复位的线性切口技术相比,用于骨传导听力植入物的微创桥手术:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2016 Nov 9;17(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1662-0.
8
Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: inside or outside the line of incision?经皮骨锚式听力植入手术:切口线内侧还是外侧?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Nov;273(11):3713-3722. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4020-7. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
9
A Clinical Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery With a Modified Drill System for Inserting Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants.改良钻头系统微创耳内式骨锚定助听植入术的临床评估。
Otol Neurotol. 2021 Sep 1;42(8):1192-1200. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003195.
10
Bone-anchored Hearing Implant Surgery: Randomized Trial of Dermatome Versus Linear Incision Without Soft Tissue Reduction--Clinical Measures.骨锚式听力植入手术:皮刀与无软组织缩减的线性切口对比随机试验——临床测量
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jun;36(5):805-11. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000731.

引用本文的文献

1
Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Effects on Vestibular Function: A Preliminary Report.骨锚式助听器对前庭功能的影响:初步报告。
Audiol Res. 2024 Apr 20;14(2):386-400. doi: 10.3390/audiolres14020033.
2
Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants: Surgical and Audiological Comparison of Different Surgical Techniques.骨锚式助听器:不同手术技术的外科手术及听力学比较
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Mar 2;26(4):e649-e656. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742765. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Evaluation of a New Drill System for Placement of Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices.一种用于经皮骨传导装置植入的新型钻孔系统的评估
Front Surg. 2022 Mar 21;9:858117. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.858117. eCollection 2022.
4
Comparison between linear incision and punch techniques for bone anchored hearing aid surgery.线性切口与冲切技术在骨锚式助听器手术中的比较。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2021 Oct;41(5):474-480. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N1048.
5
Long-Term Outcomes of the Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery vs. Linear Incision Technique With Soft Tissue Preservation for Installation of Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices.微创桥接手术与保留软组织的线性切口技术用于经皮骨传导装置植入的长期疗效比较
Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 24;12:632987. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.632987. eCollection 2021.
6
Ten years of experience with the Ponto bone-anchored hearing system-A systematic literature review.十年的 Ponto 骨锚式听力系统应用经验——系统文献回顾。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2020 Sep;45(5):667-680. doi: 10.1111/coa.13556. Epub 2020 May 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Short-term results from seventy-six patients receiving a bone-anchored hearing implant installed with a novel minimally invasive surgery technique.76例患者采用新型微创手术技术植入骨锚式听力植入物的短期结果。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2017 Oct;42(5):1043-1048. doi: 10.1111/coa.12803. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
2
Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery compared to the linear incision technique without soft tissue reduction for bone conduction hearing implants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.与不进行软组织复位的线性切口技术相比,用于骨传导听力植入物的微创桥手术:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2016 Nov 9;17(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1662-0.
3
Bone anchored hearing implants without skin thinning: the Gruppo Otologico surgical and audiological experience.无需皮肤减薄的骨锚式听力植入物:Gruppo Otologico的手术及听力学经验
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Feb;274(2):695-700. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4305-x. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
4
Controlled Clinical Trial on Bone-anchored Hearing Implants and a Surgical Technique With Soft-tissue Preservation.骨锚式助听器及软组织保留手术技术的对照临床试验
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Jun;37(5):504-12. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000994.
5
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Osseointegrated Auditory Implants: A Comparison of Linear versus Punch Techniques.骨整合听觉植入物的微创手术:线性技术与冲孔技术的比较
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Jun;152(6):1089-93. doi: 10.1177/0194599815571532. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
6
Clinical performance of a new magnetic bone conduction hearing implant system: results from a prospective, multicenter, clinical investigation.一种新型磁骨传导听力植入系统的临床性能:一项前瞻性、多中心临床研究的结果
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jun;36(5):834-41. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000712.
7
Bone-anchored hearing device surgery: Linear incision without soft tissue reduction. A prospective study.
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2015 Sep-Oct;66(5):258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
8
The Cochlear Baha 4 Attract System - design concepts, surgical technique and early clinical results.科利耳骨锚式助听器4磁吸系统——设计理念、手术技术及早期临床结果
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015 May;12(3):223-30. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2015.990375. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
9
Cutaneous complications in osseointegrated implants: comparison between classic and tissue preservation techniques.
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2015 May-Jun;66(3):148-53. doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
10
A minimally invasive technique for the implantation of bone-anchored hearing devices.骨锚式助听器植入的微创技术。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Sep;149(3):473-7. doi: 10.1177/0194599813492946. Epub 2013 Jun 5.

骨锚式听力植入手术:我们采用线性切口和打孔技术的经验。

Bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: our experience with linear incision and punch techniques.

作者信息

DI Giustino F, Vannucchi P, Pecci R, Mengucci A, Santimone R, Giannoni B

机构信息

Audiology Unit, AOU Careggi, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2018 Jun;38(3):257-263. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1694.

DOI:10.14639/0392-100X-1694
PMID:29984803
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6036957/
Abstract

In recent years, bone-anchored hearing implants (BAHIs) have found wider application in the treatment of conductive and mixed hearing loss. Several surgical techniques have been developed to reduce complications, enhance healing and improve audiological and aesthetic results. We report our experience on the use of three BAHI surgery techniques: Group 1, linear incision with thinning of the subcutaneous tissue; Group 2, linear incision without thinning of the subcutaneous tissue; Group 3, punch technique (Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery, MIPS). We retrospectively analysed patients undergoing BAHI surgery; results were evaluated on the basis of any intra-operative complication, duration of surgery and occurrence of adverse effects at the implantation site over 1 year of follow-up. We collected a total of 30 implantations (12 for Group 1, 8 for Group 2, 10 for Group 3) with an intra-operative complication rate of 25%, 0% and 10%, respectively. The average surgical time was 62.08 minutes, 34.37 minutes and 18.7 minutes respectively. During follow-up, we reported the occurrence of adverse effects in 10.63% of observations in Group 1, 3.12% in Group 2 and 2.5% in Group 3. This study confirms the low rate of intra and postoperative complications during BAHI surgery and documents the simplicity of execution of the novel MIPS technique, with a significant reduction in surgical time compared to the other two techniques, and positive effects in terms of health care costs.

摘要

近年来,骨锚式助听器(BAHI)在传导性和混合性听力损失的治疗中得到了更广泛的应用。已经开发了几种手术技术来减少并发症、促进愈合并改善听力和美学效果。我们报告了我们使用三种BAHI手术技术的经验:第1组,线性切口并皮下组织变薄;第2组,线性切口但皮下组织不变薄;第3组,打孔技术(微创骨桥手术,MIPS)。我们对接受BAHI手术的患者进行了回顾性分析;根据任何术中并发症、手术持续时间以及随访1年内在植入部位出现的不良反应来评估结果。我们总共收集了30例植入病例(第1组12例,第2组8例,第3组10例),术中并发症发生率分别为25%、0%和10%。平均手术时间分别为62.08分钟、34.37分钟和18.7分钟。在随访期间,我们报告第1组10.63%的观察病例、第2组3.12%的观察病例和第3组2.5%的观察病例出现了不良反应。本研究证实了BAHI手术中术中和术后并发症的发生率较低,并记录了新型MIPS技术执行的简便性,与其他两种技术相比手术时间显著缩短,且在医疗保健成本方面有积极影响。