Zheng Wei Jun, Zhou Xu Dong, Wang Xiao Lei, Hesketh Therese
College of Basic Medical Science, Zhejiang Chinese Medical School, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Arch Sex Behav. 2014 Apr;43(3):621-9. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0097-x. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
The construct of sociosexuality or sociosexual orientation describes the extent to which people will have casual, uncommitted sexual relationships. The Sociosexual Orientation Inventory (SOI) has been used to measure sociosexuality in many countries, but not in China. The aims of this study were to explore sociosexuality in a cross-section of the Chinese adult population, to quantify sex differences in sociosexuality, and to examine the sociodemographic correlates and the impact of the high sex ratio. The study consisted of a cross-sectional survey using a self-completion questionnaire. It was administered to adults of reproductive age in three provinces: Zhejiang, Guizhou, and Yunnan. While questionnaires were received from 7,424 participants, total SOI scores could be computed only for the 4,645 (63 %) who completed all seven items of the SOI. The mean score for men and women combined was 21.0, very low compared with most other countries, indicating restricted sociosexuality. The men (n = 2,048) had a mean of 27, showing more restricted sociosexuality than in all other countries where the SOI has been used. Wealth was the strongest independent correlate of high (unrestricted) sociosexuality in men and women. The effect size for the difference between the sexes was moderate (Cohen's d = .64), and comparable to more developed countries, perhaps reflecting relative gender equality in contemporary China. Despite the very high sex ratio, which is theorized to lead to restricted sexuality, its influence was difficult to determine, since differences in sociosexuality between high and low sex ratio areas within this population were inconsistent.
社会性取向或性社交取向这一概念描述了人们在多大程度上会发生随意的、无承诺的性关系。性社交取向量表(SOI)已在许多国家用于测量社会性取向,但在中国尚未使用。本研究的目的是探讨中国成年人群体中的社会性取向,量化社会性取向中的性别差异,并研究社会人口学相关因素以及高性别比的影响。该研究包括一项使用自填问卷的横断面调查。调查对象为浙江、贵州和云南三省的育龄成年人。虽然共收到7424名参与者的问卷,但只有完成性社交取向量表所有七个项目的4645人(63%)的总分能够计算出来。男性和女性的合并平均分为21.0,与大多数其他国家相比非常低,表明社会性取向受限。男性(n = 2048)的平均分为27,显示出比所有其他使用性社交取向量表的国家都更受限的社会性取向。财富是男性和女性高(不受限)社会性取向最强的独立相关因素。两性之间差异的效应量适中(科恩d值 = 0.64),与更发达国家相当,这或许反映了当代中国相对的性别平等。尽管性别比非常高,理论上这会导致性取向受限,但由于该人群中高性别比地区和低性别比地区之间社会性取向的差异并不一致,其影响难以确定。