• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

起搏部位特征对心脏再同步治疗反应的影响。

Influence of pacing site characteristics on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jul;6(4):542-50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.000146. Epub 2013 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.000146
PMID:23741053
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transmural scar occupying left ventricular (LV) pacing regions has been associated with reduced response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, spatial influences of lead tip delivery relative to scar at both pacing sites remain poorly explored. This study evaluated scar distribution relative to LV and right ventricular (RV) lead tip placement through coregistration of late gadolinium enhancement MRI and cardiac computed tomographic (CT) findings. Influences on CRT response were assessed by serial echocardiography.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty patients receiving CRT underwent preimplant late gadolinium enhancement MRI, postimplant cardiac CT, and serial echocardiography. Blinded segmental evaluations of mechanical delay, percentage scar burden, and lead tip location were performed. Response to CRT was defined as a reduction in LV end-systolic volume ≥15% at 6 months. The mean age and LV ejection fraction were 64±9 years and 25±7%, respectively. Mean scar volume was higher among CRT nonresponders for both the LV (23±23% versus 8±14% [P=0.01]) and RV pacing regions (40±32% versus 24±30% [P=0.04]). Significant pacing region scar was identified in 13% of LV pacing regions and 37% of RV pacing regions. Absence of scar in both regions was associated with an 81% response rate compared with 55%, 25%, and 0%, respectively, when the RV, LV, or both pacing regions contained scar. LV pacing region dyssynchrony was not predictive of response.

CONCLUSIONS

Myocardial scar occupying the LV pacing region is associated with nonresponse to CRT. Scar occupying the RV pacing region is encountered at higher frequency and seems to provide a more intermediate influence on CRT response.

摘要

背景

透壁性瘢痕占据左心室(LV)起搏区域与心脏再同步治疗(CRT)反应降低有关。然而,相对于起搏部位的瘢痕,导线尖端输送的空间影响仍未得到充分探索。本研究通过心脏磁共振延迟钆增强成像(LGE-MRI)和心脏计算机断层扫描(CT)的核心配准,评估了瘢痕分布与 LV 和右心室(RV)导线尖端放置的关系。通过连续超声心动图评估 CRT 反应的影响。

方法和结果

60 例接受 CRT 的患者接受了心脏 MRI 延迟钆增强扫描、心脏 CT 扫描和连续超声心动图检查。对机械延迟、瘢痕负荷百分比和导线尖端位置进行了盲法节段评估。CRT 反应定义为 6 个月时 LV 收缩末期容积减少≥15%。患者平均年龄和 LV 射血分数分别为 64±9 岁和 25±7%。LV 和 RV 起搏区域的瘢痕体积在 CRT 无反应者中均较高(LV:23±23%比 8±14%,P=0.01;RV:40±32%比 24±30%,P=0.04)。在 13%的 LV 起搏区域和 37%的 RV 起搏区域发现明显的起搏区域瘢痕。当 RV、LV 或两者均存在瘢痕时,无瘢痕区域与 81%的反应率相关,而分别为 55%、25%和 0%。LV 起搏区域不同步不能预测反应。

结论

占据 LV 起搏区域的心肌瘢痕与 CRT 无反应有关。RV 起搏区域存在瘢痕的频率更高,对 CRT 反应的影响似乎更居中。

相似文献

1
Influence of pacing site characteristics on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.起搏部位特征对心脏再同步治疗反应的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jul;6(4):542-50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.000146. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
2
Model-based navigation of left and right ventricular leads to optimal targets for cardiac resynchronization therapy: a single-center feasibility study.基于模型的左右心室导线导航至心脏再同步治疗的最佳靶点:一项单中心可行性研究。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Dec;7(6):1040-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.001729. Epub 2014 Sep 14.
3
Left ventricular scar impact on left ventricular synchronization parameters and outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy.左心室瘢痕对左心室同步参数及心脏再同步治疗结果的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 1;222:665-670. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.158. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
4
Left ventricular lead position, mechanical activation, and myocardial scar in relation to left ventricular reverse remodeling and clinical outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy: A feature-tracking and contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.左心室导线位置、机械激活与心肌瘢痕在心衰心脏再同步化治疗后左心室逆重构及临床转归中的关系:特征追踪和对比增强心血管磁共振研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Feb;13(2):481-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.10.024. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
5
Pre- and intra-procedural predictors of reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy: an MRI study.心脏再同步治疗后逆向重构的术前和术中预测因素:一项 MRI 研究。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Jun;24(6):682-91. doi: 10.1111/jce.12101. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
6
Pacing transmural scar tissue reduces left ventricle reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.起搏透壁瘢痕组织可减少心脏再同步治疗后的左心室逆重构。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Jul 15;167(1):94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.12.006. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
7
Utility of dual-source computed tomography in cardiac resynchronization therapy-DIRECT study.双源 CT 在心脏再同步治疗中的应用-DIRECT 研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Aug;15(8):1206-1213. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.03.020. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
8
Ventricular pacing site separation by cardiac computed tomography: validation for the prediction of clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.通过心脏计算机断层扫描评估心室起搏部位分离:对心脏再同步治疗临床反应预测的验证
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Sep;33(9):1433-1442. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1120-4. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
9
Focal But Not Diffuse Myocardial Fibrosis Burden Quantification Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Left Ventricular Reverse Modeling Following Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.使用心脏磁共振成像进行局灶性而非弥漫性心肌纤维化负担定量可预测心脏再同步治疗后的左心室逆向重构。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Feb;27(2):203-9. doi: 10.1111/jce.12855. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
10
Echocardiographic Prediction of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response Requires Analysis of Both Mechanical Dyssynchrony and Right Ventricular Function: A Combined Analysis of Patient Data and Computer Simulations.超声心动图预测心脏再同步治疗反应需要分析机械不同步和右心室功能:患者数据和计算机模拟的联合分析。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 Oct;30(10):1012-1020.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Leadless ultrasound-based LV endocardial pacing for CRT: systematic review and meta-analysis.基于无导线超声的左心室心内膜起搏用于心脏再同步治疗:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Jul 16;25(1):513. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04965-5.
2
JOINT DEEP LEARNING FOR IMPROVED MYOCARDIAL SCAR DETECTION FROM CARDIAC MRI.联合深度学习用于改进从心脏磁共振成像中检测心肌瘢痕
Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2023 Apr;2023. doi: 10.1109/isbi53787.2023.10230541. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
3
Current Role of Electrocardiographic Imaging in Patient Selection for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
心电图成像在心脏再同步治疗患者选择中的当前作用
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Jan 15;11(1):24. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11010024.
4
Leadless Pacing: Therapy, Challenges and Novelties.无导线起搏:治疗、挑战与创新。
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2023 Apr 13;12:e09. doi: 10.15420/aer.2022.41. eCollection 2023.
5
Pacing interventions in non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy.心脏再同步治疗无反应者的起搏干预措施。
Front Physiol. 2023 Jan 26;14:1054095. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1054095. eCollection 2023.
6
Leadless Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy: Advances, Challenges and Future Directions.心脏再同步治疗中的无导线左束支区域起搏:进展、挑战与未来方向
Front Physiol. 2022 Jun 6;13:898866. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.898866. eCollection 2022.
7
Predictors of echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: A systematic review with Meta-Analysis.心脏再同步治疗超声心动图反应的预测因素:一项Meta分析的系统评价
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022 Feb 28;39:100979. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.100979. eCollection 2022 Apr.
8
Multi-Modality Imaging in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: With a Focus on the Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.扩张型心肌病的多模态成像:聚焦心脏磁共振成像的作用
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Jul 2;7:97. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00097. eCollection 2020.
9
The Importance of Right Ventricular Lead Positioning in Determining Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.右心室导线定位在确定心脏再同步治疗结果中的重要性。
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2017 Jun 15;8(6):2746-2748. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2017.080601. eCollection 2017 Jun.
10
A new method to recommend left ventricular lead positions for improved CRT volumetric response and long-term prognosis.一种新的方法来推荐左心室导线位置,以提高 CRT 容积反应和长期预后。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2021 Apr;28(2):672-684. doi: 10.1007/s12350-019-01735-7. Epub 2019 May 20.