Head and Neck Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Thyroid. 2013 Jun;23(6):683-94. doi: 10.1089/thy.2012.0307.
The American Thyroid Association guidelines recommend the routine use of radioactive iodine for remnant ablation (RRA) in all T3 or greater primary tumors, and selective use in patients with intrathyroidal disease >1 cm, or evidence of nodal metastases. The guidelines recognize that there is conflicting and inadequate data to make firm recommendations for most patients. The aim of this study was to analyze our institutional experience of the use of RRA in the management of papillary thyroid cancer, with a particular focus on outcomes for those patients selected not to receive RRA.
We retrospectively reviewed 1129 consecutive patients who underwent total thyroidectomy at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between 1986 and 2005. Of these, 490 were pT1-2 N0, 193 pT1-2 N1, and 444 pT3-4. Details on recurrence and disease-specific survival were recorded by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.
The five-year disease-specific survival and recurrence-free survival in the pT1/T2 N0, pT1-2 N1, and pT3-4 were 100% and 92%, 100% and 92%, and 98% and 87% respectively. Low-risk patients who were managed without RRA (who tended to have limited primary disease, pT1-2, and low-volume metastatic disease in the neck, pT1-2 N1-fewer than five nodes, all <1 cm greatest dimension) had five-year recurrence-free survival of >97%. In the group with advanced local tumors (pT3-4), those patients who did not receive RRA (who tended to have pT3 N0 disease) had five-year recurrence-free survival of >90%.
Following appropriate surgical management, the majority of patients with low-risk local disease and even some patients with more advanced-stage (pT3) tumors or regional metastases have low rates of recurrence and high rates of survival when managed without RRA.
美国甲状腺协会指南建议在所有 T3 或更大的原发性肿瘤中常规使用放射性碘进行残余消融(RRA),并选择性地在甲状腺内疾病>1 厘米或有淋巴结转移证据的患者中使用。该指南认识到,对于大多数患者,目前尚无确定的推荐意见,因为相关数据存在冲突且不充分。本研究旨在分析我们机构在管理甲状腺乳头状癌中使用 RRA 的经验,特别关注那些选择不接受 RRA 治疗的患者的结局。
我们回顾性分析了 1986 年至 2005 年间在纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心接受全甲状腺切除术的 1129 例连续患者。其中,490 例为 pT1-2 N0,193 例为 pT1-2 N1,444 例为 pT3-4。通过 Kaplan-Meier 法记录复发和疾病特异性生存的详细信息,并使用对数秩检验进行比较。
pT1/T2 N0、pT1-2 N1 和 pT3-4 患者的五年疾病特异性生存率和无复发生存率分别为 100%和 92%、100%和 92%以及 98%和 87%。未接受 RRA 治疗的低危患者(其原发疾病往往局限、pT1-2、颈部转移灶体积较小、pT1-2 N1-淋巴结<5 个,最大直径均<1 厘米),五年无复发生存率>97%。在局部肿瘤进展的患者(pT3-4)中,未接受 RRA 治疗的患者(往往为 pT3 N0 疾病)五年无复发生存率>90%。
在适当的手术治疗后,大多数低危局部疾病患者,甚至一些局部进展期(pT3)肿瘤或区域转移患者,如果不接受 RRA 治疗,其复发率较低,生存率较高。