Christianson Chad C, Johnson Casey J L, Needham Shane R
Alturas Analytics, Inc., Moscow, ID 83843, USA.
Bioanalysis. 2013 Jun;5(11):1387-96. doi: 10.4155/bio.13.73.
In support of bioanalysis, there has always been a desire to improve detection limits and reduce scale. Microflow LC (MFLC) coupled with MS accomplishes both of these goals.
As such, MFLC coupled with an MS system was used to generate bioanalytical validation data that met US FDA criteria. The MFLC-MS/MS data was compared with the same method with the use of conventional HPLC-MS/MS and a more than 14× S/N improvement was found with the MFLC-MS/MS method. Methotrexate was used as a model molecule to demonstrate the validation of the method from human plasma. The MFLC-MS/MS method was demonstrated to be accurate (±7%) and precise (12.9% at the LLOQ and a maximum of 11.6% at all other concentrations) across the dynamic range of the assay (1-1000 ng/ml) and compared well with the HPLC-MS/MS method. The MFLC bioanalytical validation was performed at a flow rate of 35 µl/min on a 0.5-mm inner diameter (I.D.) column, whereas, for the same linear velocities on the 2.0-mm I.D. column, the conventional HPLC bioanalytical validation was performed at 700 µl/min. Since the flow rate of the MFLC system is 20-times less than the HPLC system, the consumable solvent and disposal cost to perform the MFLC validation was significantly less.
MFLC-MS/MS can be used to perform bioanalytical method validations with increased MS signal, reduced source contamination and reduced solvent consumption.
为了支持生物分析,人们一直希望提高检测限并缩小规模。微流液相色谱(MFLC)与质谱联用实现了这两个目标。
因此,MFLC与质谱系统联用生成了符合美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)标准的生物分析验证数据。将MFLC-MS/MS数据与使用传统HPLC-MS/MS的相同方法进行比较,发现MFLC-MS/MS方法的信噪比提高了14倍以上。使用甲氨蝶呤作为模型分子来证明该方法在人血浆中的验证。在整个分析动态范围(1-1000 ng/ml)内,MFLC-MS/MS方法被证明是准确的(±7%)且精密的(在LLOQ处为12.9%,在所有其他浓度下最大为11.6%),并且与HPLC-MS/MS方法相比表现良好。MFLC生物分析验证在0.5毫米内径(I.D.)的柱上以35 μl/min的流速进行,而对于2.0毫米内径柱上相同的线性速度,传统HPLC生物分析验证在700 μl/min下进行。由于MFLC系统的流速比HPLC系统低20倍,进行MFLC验证的消耗性溶剂和处置成本显著降低。
MFLC-MS/MS可用于进行生物分析方法验证,具有增强的质谱信号、减少的源污染和降低的溶剂消耗。