• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甲状腺滤泡性增生的管理:一种基于超声的恶性程度评分,用于选择手术或保守治疗。

Management of thyroid follicular proliferation: an ultrasound-based malignancy score to opt for surgical or conservative treatment.

机构信息

Radiologia Diagnostica ed Interventistica, Azienda Ospedaliera San Paolo, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013 Aug;39(8):1350-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.02.464. Epub 2013 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.02.464
PMID:23743097
Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate whether ultrasound characteristics of thyroid nodules with a known cytologic diagnosis of "follicular pattern" (indicative of follicular hyperplasia, follicular adenoma or follicular carcinoma) can be used to define a nodule malignancy score to limit surgery to selected, higher-risk cases. In pre-operative ultrasound results of patients diagnosed with a "follicular pattern" on cytology who subsequently underwent surgery, each nodule feature was given a score from 0 (most likely benign) to 2 (most likely malignant), resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 11. The total nodule score (total malignancy score) was then compared with the definitive histologic diagnosis. According to our results, surgery is advisable in patients with score ≥4 (79% of carcinomas), ultrasound follow-up seems to be appropriate for patients with a score of 3 (21% of carcinomas) and no action is recommended for patients with score <3 (only benign nodules).

摘要

本研究旨在评估具有已知细胞学诊断为“滤泡模式”(提示滤泡增生、滤泡性腺瘤或滤泡癌)的甲状腺结节的超声特征是否可用于定义结节恶性评分,以将手术仅限于选定的高风险病例。在细胞学诊断为“滤泡模式”的患者的术前超声结果中,对随后接受手术的每个结节特征进行评分,从 0(最可能良性)到 2(最可能恶性),总分为 0 至 11 分。然后将总结节评分(总恶性评分)与明确的组织学诊断进行比较。根据我们的结果,对于评分≥4 的患者(79%的癌)建议手术,对于评分 3 的患者(21%的癌)超声随访似乎是合适的,而评分<3 的患者(仅为良性结节)则不建议采取任何行动。

相似文献

1
Management of thyroid follicular proliferation: an ultrasound-based malignancy score to opt for surgical or conservative treatment.甲状腺滤泡性增生的管理:一种基于超声的恶性程度评分,用于选择手术或保守治疗。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013 Aug;39(8):1350-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.02.464. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
2
Ultrasonographic features associated with malignancy in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules.超声特征与细胞学不确定的甲状腺结节中的恶性肿瘤相关。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Feb;40(2):182-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.11.015. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
3
Does the presence of additional thyroid nodules on ultrasound alter the risk of malignancy in patients with a follicular neoplasm of the thyroid?超声检查发现的额外甲状腺结节是否会改变甲状腺滤泡性肿瘤患者的恶性风险?
Surgery. 2007 Dec;142(6):851-7; discussion 857.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.08.011. Epub 2007 Oct 26.
4
Sonographically suspicious thyroid nodules with initially benign cytologic results: the role of a core needle biopsy.超声检查提示甲状腺结节可疑,且最初的细胞学检查结果为良性:核心针穿刺活检的作用。
Thyroid. 2013 Jun;23(6):703-8. doi: 10.1089/thy.2012.0426. Epub 2013 May 28.
5
Thyroid cancer in the thyroid nodules evaluated by ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology.通过超声检查和细针穿刺细胞学检查评估的甲状腺结节中的甲状腺癌。
Thyroid. 2005 Jul;15(7):708-17. doi: 10.1089/thy.2005.15.708.
6
Combined clinical, thyroid ultrasound and cytological features help to predict thyroid malignancy in follicular and Hupsilonrthle cell thyroid lesions: results from a series of 505 consecutive patients.结合临床、甲状腺超声和细胞学特征有助于预测滤泡性和许特尔细胞甲状腺病变中的甲状腺恶性肿瘤:来自连续505例患者的系列研究结果。
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2007 Jan;66(1):13-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02677.x.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration biopsy cytology and ultrasonography in patients with thyroid nodules diagnosed as benign or indeterminate before thyroidectomy.术前诊断为良性或不确定的甲状腺结节患者行细针抽吸活检细胞学检查和超声检查的诊断准确性。
Endocr J. 2013;60(3):375-82. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.ej12-0338. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
8
Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules at elastosonography.甲状腺结节弹性成像中良恶性的鉴别诊断。
Ultraschall Med. 2009 Apr;30(2):175-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1027442. Epub 2008 May 21.
9
Evaluation of cytologically benign solitary thyroid nodules by ultrasonography: a retrospective analysis of 1877 cases.超声检查对细胞学良性孤立性甲状腺结节的评估:1877例病例的回顾性分析
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2013 Jun;40(3):308-11. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2012.09.007. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
10
Does Hurthle cell lesion/neoplasm predict malignancy more than follicular lesion/neoplasm on thyroid fine-needle aspiration?在甲状腺细针穿刺中,嗜酸性细胞病变/肿瘤比滤泡性病变/肿瘤更能预测恶性肿瘤吗?
Diagn Cytopathol. 2006 May;34(5):330-4. doi: 10.1002/dc.20440.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of ultrasound in predicting telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation in follicular thyroid carcinoma.超声在预测滤泡状甲状腺癌中端粒酶逆转录酶(TERT)启动子突变中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 3;14(1):15323. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66351-z.
2
Ultrasonographic and cytologic assessments of follicular neoplasms of the thyroid: Predictive features differentiating follicular carcinoma from follicular adenoma.甲状腺滤泡性肿瘤的超声及细胞学评估:鉴别滤泡癌与滤泡性腺瘤的预测特征。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 21;17(7):e0271437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271437. eCollection 2022.
3
The Value of Sonography in Distinguishing Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma from Adenoma.
超声检查在鉴别甲状腺滤泡癌与腺瘤中的价值。
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 May 17;13:3991-4002. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S307166. eCollection 2021.
4
Sonographic Features Differentiating Follicular Thyroid Cancer from Follicular Adenoma-A Meta-Analysis.超声特征鉴别滤泡状甲状腺癌与滤泡性腺瘤的Meta分析
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 24;13(5):938. doi: 10.3390/cancers13050938.
5
Use of the ultrasound-based total malignancy score in the management of thyroid nodules.基于超声的总恶性风险评分在甲状腺结节管理中的应用。
Ultrasonography. 2018 Oct;37(4):315-322. doi: 10.14366/usg.17063. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
6
Quantitative analysis of echogenicity for patients with thyroid nodules.甲状腺结节患者回声性的定量分析。
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 20;6:35632. doi: 10.1038/srep35632.
7
Novel and Practical Scoring Systems for the Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules.用于诊断甲状腺结节的新型实用评分系统
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 21;11(9):e0163039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163039. eCollection 2016.