标题:环孢素局部治疗过敏性结膜炎:荟萃分析。
Topical cyclosporine in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis: a meta-analysis.
机构信息
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, China; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
出版信息
Ophthalmology. 2013 Nov;120(11):2197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.03.044. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
PURPOSE
To assess the efficacy and safety of topical cyclosporine versus placebo in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
PARTICIPANTS
Seven qualified studies incorporating 306 eyes of 153 patients were analyzed.
METHODS
Searches of randomized controlled trials were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
We assessed the methodologic quality of individual included trials and performed meta-analyses using the random effects model if P<0.1 in the test for heterogeneity, or otherwise used the fixed effects model. We assessed scores of composite signs and symptoms, reduction in steroid eye drop use in steroid-dependent patients, and safety outcomes (i.e., stinging or burning sensation).
RESULTS
At 2 weeks of follow-up or longer, evidence suggests a statistically significant improvement in the composite signs (standardized mean difference [SMD], -1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.80 to -0.62; I(2) = 71%) and symptoms (SMD, -0.84; 95% CI, -1.51 to -0.16; I(2) = 80%) after topical cyclosporine treatment for allergic conjunctivitis regardless of the dosage of treatment. There was a significant reduction (mean difference, -61.16; 95% CI, -101.61 to -20.72; I(2) = 58%) in the use of steroid eye drops in patients with steroid-dependent allergic conjunctivitis. Stinging or burning sensation (odds ratio, 2.56; 95% CI, 0.19-35.06; I(2) = 73%) was common in both the cyclosporine and placebo groups.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests topical cyclosporine could be an effective and safe treatment method for allergic conjunctivitis. Further randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes and standardized outcome measurements, follow-up periods, and cyclosporine concentrations are warranted to determine the short- and long-term efficacy and safety and the minimal effective dosage of topical cyclosporine for allergic conjunctivitis.
目的
评估局部环孢素治疗过敏性结膜炎的疗效和安全性。
设计
系统评价和荟萃分析。
参与者
纳入的 7 项合格研究共分析了 153 例患者的 306 只眼。
方法
在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、ClinicalTrials.gov 和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台上进行了随机对照试验检索。
主要观察指标
我们评估了纳入试验的方法学质量,并在异质性检验 P<0.1 时使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,否则使用固定效应模型。我们评估了复合体征和症状评分、依赖激素眼液的患者中激素眼液使用减少量以及安全性结局(即刺痛或烧灼感)。
结果
在随访 2 周或更长时间时,有证据表明,局部环孢素治疗过敏性结膜炎后,在复合体征(标准化均数差[SMD],-1.21;95%置信区间[CI],-1.80 至-0.62;I²=71%)和症状(SMD,-0.84;95%CI,-1.51 至-0.16;I²=80%)方面有统计学意义的改善,而与治疗剂量无关。在依赖激素的过敏性结膜炎患者中,激素眼液的使用显著减少(平均差,-61.16;95%CI,-101.61 至-20.72;I²=58%)。在环孢素和安慰剂组中,刺痛或烧灼感(比值比,2.56;95%CI,0.19-35.06;I²=73%)均很常见。
结论
本系统评价和荟萃分析表明,局部环孢素可能是治疗过敏性结膜炎的一种有效且安全的方法。需要进一步开展具有更大样本量、标准化结局测量、更长随访时间以及环孢素浓度的随机对照试验,以确定局部环孢素治疗过敏性结膜炎的短期和长期疗效和安全性以及最小有效剂量。