Richardson Cameron B, Hitti Aline, Mulvey Kelly Lynn, Killen Melanie
Pennsylvania State University, 135 E. Nittany Ave., Suite 402 State College, University Park, PA, 16801, USA,
J Youth Adolesc. 2014 Aug;43(8):1281-94. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9967-8. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
Past research has shown that adolescents justify social exclusion based on concerns for group functioning, and yet, to date, no study has evaluated whether group functioning justifications shift or remain stable across different exclusion contexts. In this study, we systematically manipulated exclusion context (i.e., competitive or noncompetitive soccer groups) and individual characteristics of the target of exclusion to test the nature of the interaction between these factors during exclusion judgments. Adolescents' (N = 201; 61% Female) exclusion judgments differed across contexts only when an individual's ability was under consideration. Intergroup (i.e., gender, nationality) and interpersonal (i.e., aggression, shyness) characteristics overwhelmed contextual considerations. Results indicate the complexity of factors weighed by adolescents when making exclusion judgments, and suggest the need for extension of the present findings to understand more fully the interaction between the context of exclusion and individual characteristics in exclusion judgments.
以往的研究表明,青少年会基于对群体功能的担忧来为社会排斥行为辩解。然而,迄今为止,尚无研究评估在不同的排斥情境下,基于群体功能的辩解是会发生变化还是保持稳定。在本研究中,我们系统地操纵了排斥情境(即竞争性或非竞争性足球群体)以及被排斥对象的个体特征,以检验在排斥判断过程中这些因素之间相互作用的性质。仅当考虑个体能力时,青少年(N = 201;61%为女性)的排斥判断才会因情境不同而有所差异。群体间特征(即性别、国籍)和人际特征(即攻击性、害羞)比情境因素更为重要。结果表明,青少年在做出排斥判断时所权衡的因素较为复杂,并建议扩展当前的研究结果,以更全面地理解排斥情境与排斥判断中个体特征之间的相互作用。