Quinn M P, Gati J S, Klassen L M, Lin A W, Bird J R, Leung S E, Menon R S
Departments of Medical Biophysics.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Jan;35(1):38-44. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3584. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
SWI is an MR technique conventionally implemented with single-echo gradient-echo data. The purpose of this study was to compare single-echo SWI processing and 2 multiecho SWI processing schemes: postaverage, where an SWI image is created for each echo and then averaged to create a single volume; and frequency-based, where a SWI image is generated from an average frequency image. Linear and nonlinear mask functions were investigated for all 3 processing schemes.
Comprehensive optimizations were performed. Single and multigradient-echo data were acquired at 3T in 10 volunteers. Contrast-to-noise ratio was measured in various structures. Visibilities of the same structures were ranked in different SWI images by trained raters.
When image evaluation was based on measurements of contrast-to-noise ratio, the nonlinear mask and frequency-based scheme were superior. However, when image evaluation was based on ranks of qualitative visibility, the linear mask and postaverage scheme were superior. Although the nonlinear mask and frequency-based scheme allow increased contrast of paramagnetic perturbers such as the globus pallidus, periventricular veins, red nucleus, and subthalamic nucleus, they do not necessarily increase the information content of the image; rather, they result in a harsh contrast that is visually unpleasing to radiologists and wherein more subtle structure is relatively less apparent.
Linearly masked postaverage SWI is the recommended implementation of multiecho SWI for radiologic use; however, nonlinearly masked frequency-based SWI may have use in computer-based segmentation or registration.
磁敏感加权成像(SWI)是一种传统上利用单回波梯度回波数据实现的磁共振技术。本研究的目的是比较单回波SWI处理与两种多回波SWI处理方案:平均后处理,即针对每个回波创建一幅SWI图像,然后将其平均以创建一个单一体积;以及基于频率处理,即从平均频率图像生成一幅SWI图像。对所有三种处理方案研究了线性和非线性掩膜函数。
进行了全面优化。在3T场强下对10名志愿者采集了单梯度回波和多梯度回波数据。在各种结构中测量了对比噪声比。由经过培训的评估人员对不同SWI图像中相同结构的可见性进行排序。
当基于对比噪声比测量进行图像评估时,非线性掩膜和基于频率的方案更优。然而,当基于定性可见性排序进行图像评估时,线性掩膜和平均后处理方案更优。尽管非线性掩膜和基于频率的方案能增加诸如苍白球、脑室周围静脉、红核和丘脑底核等顺磁性干扰物的对比度,但它们不一定会增加图像的信息含量;相反,它们会导致对比度过于强烈,在视觉上让放射科医生感到不悦,而且其中更细微的结构相对不那么明显。
线性掩膜平均后处理的SWI是放射学应用中多回波SWI的推荐实施方案;然而,非线性掩膜基于频率的SWI可能在基于计算机的分割或配准中有应用价值。