Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The State University of New York at Buffalo 4949 Harlem Rd, Amherst, NY 14226, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Aug;41(8):1801-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546513490649. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
Bone bruising, commonly found on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, may be associated with intra-articular injuries, but little is known about this association.
To examine demographic factors and intra-articular injuries associated with bone bruising in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction.
Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.
Patients with ACL injury who had an MRI within 6 weeks and arthroscopy within 3 months of injury were included in this prospective study (N = 171). Presence and severity of bone bruising were determined from preoperative MRIs for each anatomic site: lateral femoral condyle (LFC), lateral tibial plateau (LTP), medial femoral condyle (MFC), and medial tibial plateau (MTP). Multiple logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for predictors of bruising and associations between bruising and intra-articular injuries found during arthroscopy. Outcomes included the presence of bruising and severity of lateral bruising (mild, moderate, severe vs none/minimal bruising).
Frequencies of bone bruising were as follows: 85% LTP, 77% LFC, 26% MTP, and 6% MFC. Patient age between 18 and 28 years (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.09-0.82) and 29 years and older (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.05-0.61) predicted less LFC bruising compared with patients aged 17 years and younger. Age (18-28 years: OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03-0.66; ≥29 years: OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.02-0.68) and contact injuries (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04-0.78) predicted less moderate LFC bruising. Male sex predicted mild (OR, 6.16; 95% CI, 1.44-26.43), moderate (OR, 8.98; 95% CI, 1.96-41.19), and severe (OR, 15.66; 95% CI, 3.19-76.92) LFC bruising. Male sex also predicted mild LTP bruising (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.05-0.83), and contact injuries predicted severe LTP bruising (OR, 5.01; 95% CI, 1.21-20.67). LFC bruising (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.04-6.32) and LTP bruising (OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.06-9.23) were associated with lateral meniscal tears. Moderate (OR, 8.14; 95% CI, 1.93-34.27) and severe (OR, 15.30; 95% CI, 2.34-100.10) LTP bruising was associated with medial meniscal tears. MFC bruising and MTP bruising were not associated with any predictors or intra-articular injuries.
Bone bruising is more common and severe in young men, and lateral bone bruising is associated with lateral meniscal tears. Medial meniscal tears are associated with increased severity of LTP bruising.
前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤后,磁共振成像(MRI)常可见骨挫伤,可能与关节内损伤有关,但对此关联知之甚少。
检查与 ACL 重建患者骨挫伤相关的人口统计学因素和关节内损伤。
病例对照研究;证据水平,3 级。
本前瞻性研究纳入了 ACL 损伤后 6 周内行 MRI 检查且伤后 3 个月内行关节镜检查的患者(N=171)。通过术前 MRI 确定每个解剖部位的骨挫伤的存在和严重程度:外侧股骨髁(LFC)、外侧胫骨平台(LTP)、内侧股骨髁(MFC)和内侧胫骨平台(MTP)。使用多因素逻辑回归计算预测骨挫伤的调整比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI),以及关节镜检查中发现的骨挫伤与关节内损伤之间的关联。结局包括骨挫伤的存在和外侧骨挫伤的严重程度(轻度、中度、重度与无/轻度骨挫伤)。
骨挫伤的发生率如下:LTP 为 85%、LFC 为 77%、MTP 为 26%、MFC 为 6%。18~28 岁(OR,0.27;95%CI,0.09-0.82)和 29 岁及以上(OR,0.18;95%CI,0.05-0.61)的患者与 17 岁及以下的患者相比,LFC 骨挫伤程度较轻。年龄(18-28 岁:OR,0.15;95%CI,0.03-0.66;≥29 岁:OR,0.10;95%CI,0.02-0.68)和接触性损伤(OR,0.17;95%CI,0.04-0.78)预测 LFC 中度骨挫伤程度较轻。男性预测轻度(OR,6.16;95%CI,1.44-26.43)、中度(OR,8.98;95%CI,1.96-41.19)和重度(OR,15.66;95%CI,3.19-76.92)LFC 骨挫伤。男性还预测了轻度 LTP 骨挫伤(OR,0.19;95%CI,0.05-0.83),接触性损伤预测了重度 LTP 骨挫伤(OR,5.01;95%CI,1.21-20.67)。LFC 骨挫伤(OR,2.57;95%CI,1.04-6.32)和 LTP 骨挫伤(OR,3.13;95%CI,1.06-9.23)与外侧半月板撕裂有关。中度(OR,8.14;95%CI,1.93-34.27)和重度(OR,15.30;95%CI,2.34-100.10)LTP 骨挫伤与内侧半月板撕裂有关。MFC 骨挫伤和 MTP 骨挫伤与任何预测因素或关节内损伤均无关。
年轻男性骨挫伤更常见且更严重,外侧骨挫伤与外侧半月板撕裂有关。内侧半月板撕裂与 LTP 骨挫伤的严重程度增加有关。