• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[《慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议(GOLD)2011版——新视角下的慢性阻塞性肺疾病》]

[GOLD 2011 - COPD from a new perspective].

作者信息

Rubinsztajn Renata, Przybyłowski Tadeusz, Maskey-Warzechowska Marta, Karwat Krzysztof, Chazan Ryszarda

机构信息

Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny, Katedra i Klinika Chorób Wewngtrznych, Pneumonologii i Alergologii.

出版信息

Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2013 Apr;34(202):192-5.

PMID:23745323
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The GOLD 2011 recommendations for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) introduce a new classification system to optimize treatment in individual patients. Except for FEV,, this classification incorporates breathlessness measurement using modified medical research council questionnaire (mMRC) or the COPD assessment Test (CAT) and the number of exacerbations. The aim of our study was to compare the GOLD 2010 and GOLD 2011 COPD.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study group consisted of 143 patients. Based on the post-bronchodilator FEV, only, as recommended in the GOLD 2010 report, there were 24 patients in stage I, 57patients in II, 43 in Ill and 19 in IV, respectively. In all patients, the number of exacerbations per year was noted and dyspnea was assessed with the modified MRC scale. The patients were subsequently graded to group A,B,C,D as proposed in the combined COPD assessment in GOLD 2011.

RESULTS

Grading of 51 (35,7%) patients according to the GOLD 2011 criteria was difficult; there were 22 patients in GOLD stage I/II with > or =2 exacerbations per year and 29 patients in GOLD stage Ill/IV with < 2 exacerbations per year. They were grading to more risk group.

CONCLUSION

The new classification according to GOLD 2011 lets on optimizations of the treatment, in most cases of COPD patients but in clinical practice, there may be problems with the classification of the patients with severe airway obstruction without frequent exacerbations and especially those with mild/moderate airflow limitation and frequent exacerbations.

摘要

未标注

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的《慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议2011》建议引入一种新的分类系统,以优化个体患者的治疗。除第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV₁)外,该分类纳入了使用改良医学研究委员会问卷(mMRC)或慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试(CAT)进行的呼吸困难测量以及急性加重次数。我们研究的目的是比较《慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议2010》和《慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议2011》对慢性阻塞性肺疾病的分类。

材料与方法

研究组由143例患者组成。根据《慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议2010》报告中的建议,仅依据支气管扩张剂后FEV₁,分别有24例患者处于I期,57例处于II期,43例处于III期,19例处于IV期。记录所有患者每年的急性加重次数,并使用改良的医学研究委员会量表评估呼吸困难情况。随后,按照《慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议2011》中联合慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估的提议,将患者分为A、B、C、D组。

结果

根据《慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议2011》标准对51例(35.7%)患者进行分级存在困难;有22例《慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议》I/II期患者每年急性加重≥2次,29例《慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议》III/IV期患者每年急性加重<2次。他们被分级到更高风险组。

结论

《慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议2011》的新分类有助于优化大多数慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的治疗,但在临床实践中,对于气道严重阻塞但急性加重不频繁的患者,尤其是气流受限为轻度/中度且急性加重频繁的患者,分类可能存在问题。

相似文献

1
[GOLD 2011 - COPD from a new perspective].[《慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议(GOLD)2011版——新视角下的慢性阻塞性肺疾病》]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2013 Apr;34(202):192-5.
2
[Diagnostic and treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on GOLD statement 2011].基于2011年慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议声明的慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断与治疗
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2012 Oct;33(196):187-92.
3
GOLD Classification of COPD: Discordance in Criteria for Symptoms and Exacerbation Risk Assessment.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的GOLD分类:症状与急性加重风险评估标准中的不一致性
COPD. 2017 Feb;14(1):1-6. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2016.1230844. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
4
Comparison of Australian and international guidelines for grading severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.澳大利亚与国际慢性阻塞性肺疾病严重程度分级指南的比较
Intern Med J. 2006 Aug;36(8):506-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01142.x.
5
Using post-bronchodilator FEV₁ is better than pre-bronchodilator FEV₁ in evaluation of COPD severity.使用支气管扩张剂后 FEV₁ 比支气管扩张剂前 FEV₁ 更能评估 COPD 严重程度。
COPD. 2012 Jun;9(3):276-80. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2012.654529. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
6
[Bronchial obstruction reversibility test in the assessment of COPD severity--controversies].[支气管阻塞可逆性试验在慢性阻塞性肺疾病严重程度评估中的争议]
Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2006;74(1):68-71.
7
Comparison of global initiative for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2013 classification and body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exacerbations index in predicting mortality and exacerbations in elderly adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议2013分类与体重指数、气流阻塞、呼吸困难和加重指数在预测老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者死亡率和病情加重方面的比较
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Feb;63(2):244-50. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13258. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
8
Prediction of the clinical course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, using the new GOLD classification: a study of the general population.采用新 GOLD 分类法预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病的临床病程:一项普通人群研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Nov 15;186(10):975-81. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201207-1299OC. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
9
Comparisons of health status scores with MRC grades in COPD: implications for the GOLD 2011 classification.COPD 患者健康状况评分与 MRC 分级的比较:对 GOLD 2011 分类的影响。
Eur Respir J. 2013 Sep;42(3):647-54. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00125612. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
10
[Comparison of lung volume response with airflow response to bronchodilator in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].[慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺容积反应与支气管扩张剂气流反应的比较]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2010 Feb;33(2):109-13.