• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用精益理念提升用药安全:探寻“完美剂量”

Using lean to improve medication administration safety: in search of the "perfect dose".

作者信息

Ching Joan M, Long Christina, Williams Barbara L, Blackmore C Craig

机构信息

Hospital Quality and Safety, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, USA.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 May;39(5):195-204. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39026-6.

DOI:10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39026-6
PMID:23745478
Abstract

BACKGROUND

At Virginia Mason Medical Center (Seattle), the Collaborative Alliance for Nursing Outcomes (CALNOC) Medication Administration Accuracy Quality Study was used in combination with Lean quality improvement efforts to address medication administration safety.

METHODS

Lean interventions were targeted at improving the medication room layout, applying visual controls, and implementing nursing standard work. The interventions were designed to prevent medication administration errors through improving six safe practices: (1) comparing medication with medication administration record, (2) labeling medication, (3) checking two forms of patient identification, (4) explaining medication to patient, (5) charting medication immediately, and (6) protecting the process from distractions/interruptions.

RESULTS

Trained nurse auditors observed 9,244 doses for 2,139 patients. Following the intervention, the number of safe-practice violations decreased from 83 violations/100 doses at baseline (January 2010-March 2010) to 42 violations/100 doses at final follow-up (July 2011-September 2011), resulting in an absolute risk reduction of 42 violations/100 doses (95% confidence interval [CI]: 35-48), p < .001). The number of medication administration errors decreased from 10.3 errors/100 doses at baseline to 2.8 errors/100 doses at final follow-up (absolute risk reduction: 7 violations/100 doses [95% CI: 5-10, p < .001]). The "perfect dose" score, reflecting compliance with all six safe practices and absence of any of the eight medication administration errors, improved from 37 in compliance/100 doses at baseline to 68 in compliance/100 doses at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Lean process improvements coupled with direct observation can contribute to substantial decreases in errors in nursing medication administration.

摘要

背景

在弗吉尼亚梅森医疗中心(西雅图),护理结果协作联盟(CALNOC)的用药准确性质量研究与精益质量改进措施相结合,以解决用药安全问题。

方法

精益干预措施旨在改善配药室布局、应用可视化管理并实施护理标准作业。这些干预措施旨在通过改进六项安全操作来预防用药错误:(1)将药品与用药记录进行比对,(2)给药品贴标签,(3)核对两种患者身份识别方式,(4)向患者解释用药情况,(5)立即记录用药情况,(6)确保操作过程不受干扰/中断。

结果

经过培训的护士审核员对2139名患者的9244剂药物进行了观察。干预后,安全操作违规次数从基线期(2010年1月至2010年3月)的83次违规/100剂降至最终随访期(2011年7月至2011年9月)的42次违规/‍100剂,绝对风险降低了42次违规/100剂(95%置信区间[CI]:35 - 48),p <.001)。用药错误次数从基线期的10.3次错误/100剂降至最终随访期的2.8次错误/100剂(绝对风险降低:7次错误/100剂[95% CI:5 - 10,p <.001])。反映符合所有六项安全操作且无八种用药错误中任何一种的“完美剂量”得分,从基线期的37次合规/100剂提高到最终随访期的68次合规/100剂。

结论

精益流程改进与直接观察相结合可大幅减少护理用药错误。

相似文献

1
Using lean to improve medication administration safety: in search of the "perfect dose".运用精益理念提升用药安全:探寻“完美剂量”
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 May;39(5):195-204. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39026-6.
2
Using lean "automation with a human touch" to improve medication safety: a step closer to the "perfect dose".运用精益的“有人情味的自动化”来提高用药安全性:向“完美剂量”更近一步。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014 Aug;40(8):341-50. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(14)40045-x.
3
Improving medication administration safety: using naïve observation to assess practice and guide improvements in process and outcomes.提高用药安全:运用单纯观察法评估实践情况并指导流程及结果的改进。
J Healthc Qual. 2014 Nov-Dec;36(6):58-68. doi: 10.1111/jhq.12090.
4
Predictors of unit-level medication administration accuracy: microsystem impacts on medication safety.单位层面药物管理准确性的预测因素:药物安全的微观系统影响。
J Nurs Adm. 2014 Jun;44(6):353-61. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000081.
5
Medication administration process assessment: applying lessons learned from commercial aviation.用药过程评估:借鉴商业航空领域的经验教训
J Nurs Adm. 2009 Feb;39(2):77-83. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e318195a5e6.
6
Pursuing safe medication use and the promise of technology.追求安全用药与技术的前景。
Medsurg Nurs. 2007 Apr;16(2):92-100.
7
Managing a new medication administration process.管理新的药物给药流程。
J Nurs Adm. 2005 Sep;35(9):410-3. doi: 10.1097/00005110-200509000-00011.
8
Association of interruptions with an increased risk and severity of medication administration errors.干扰与用药错误风险增加及严重程度之间的关联。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Apr 26;170(8):683-90. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.65.
9
Characteristics of work interruptions during medication administration.给药过程中工作中断的特征。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2009;41(4):330-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01300.x.
10
Impact of simulation-based learning on medication error rates in critically ill patients.基于模拟的学习对危重症患者用药错误率的影响。
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Sep;36(9):1526-31. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1860-2. Epub 2010 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical spotlight intervention to accelerate translation of evidence-based practices in primary care.临床重点干预加速基层医疗中基于证据实践的转化。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Dec;11(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002032.
2
Effectiveness of a multi-component quality improvement intervention on rates of hyperglycaemia.多组分质量改进干预措施对高血糖发生率的有效性
BMJ Open Qual. 2017 Oct 26;6(2):e000059. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000059. eCollection 2017.
3
Strategies for reducing medication errors in the emergency department.减少急诊科用药错误的策略。
Open Access Emerg Med. 2014 Jul 23;6:45-55. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S64174. eCollection 2014.
4
Transforming Ward Rounds Through Rounding-in-Flow.通过流程内查房改变病房查房模式
J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Dec;6(4):750-5. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00324.1.