Suppr超能文献

比较有限温磁学中竞争模型的超快退磁率。

Comparing ultrafast demagnetization rates between competing models for finite temperature magnetism.

机构信息

Department of Applied Physics, Center for NanoMaterials (cNM), Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Phys Rev Lett. 2013 May 24;110(21):217204. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.217204. Epub 2013 May 22.

Abstract

We investigate a recent controversy in ultrafast magnetization dynamics by comparing the demagnetization rates from two frequently used but competing descriptions for finite temperature magnetism, namely a rigid band structure Stoner-like approach and a system of localized spins. The calculations on the localized spin system show a demagnetization rate and time comparable to experimentally obtained values, whereas the rigid band approach yields negligible demagnetization, even when the microscopic spin-flip process is assumed to be instantaneous. This shows that rigid band structure calculations will never be in quantitative agreement with experiments, irrespective of the investigated microscopic scattering mechanism.

摘要

我们通过比较两种常用于描述有限温度磁体的竞争理论(即刚性带结构的斯托纳模型和局域自旋模型)的退磁率,研究了超快磁化动力学中的一个近期争议。对局域自旋系统的计算表明,退磁率和时间与实验获得的值相当,而刚性带结构理论即使假设微观自旋翻转过程是瞬时的,也几乎没有退磁。这表明,无论所研究的微观散射机制如何,刚性带结构的计算都不会与实验定量吻合。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验