• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鞭毛蛋白亚基 FliC 对 F18ab 大肠杆菌侵袭仔猪上皮细胞的作用。

Contribution of flagellin subunit FliC to piglet epithelial cells invasion by F18ab E. coli.

机构信息

College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.

出版信息

Vet Microbiol. 2013 Sep 27;166(1-2):220-4. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.04.030. Epub 2013 May 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.04.030
PMID:23746569
Abstract

Flagellar structures contribute to the virulence of multiple gastrointestinal pathogens either as the effectors of motility, as adhesins, or as a secretion apparatus for virulence factors. Escherichia coli F18ab variant strains are associated with edema disease (ED) in pig industries worldwide. These strains use flagella to increase the efficiency of epithelial cell invasion. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the mechanism by which flagella contribute to F18ab E. coli invasion. To explore the role of flagella in the invasion process, we performed invasion assays with either flagellated and motile, flagellated but non-motile, or non-flagellated non-motile bacteria. We observed that flagellated but non-motile bacteria invade piglet epithelial cells even more efficiently than the parent wild-type (WT) strain in vitro. By contrast, the non-flagellated bacteria have significantly reduced invasion as compared with the parent strain. These results demonstrate that flagella function mainly as adhesins to enhance the ability of F18ab E. coli to target piglet epithelial cells.

摘要

鞭毛结构作为运动效应器、黏附素或毒力因子分泌装置,有助于多种胃肠道病原体的毒力。全球范围内,猪产业中的大肠杆菌 F18ab 变异株与水肿病(ED)相关。这些菌株利用鞭毛提高上皮细胞侵袭的效率。在本研究中,我们旨在阐明鞭毛有助于 F18ab 大肠杆菌侵袭的机制。为了探究鞭毛在侵袭过程中的作用,我们用有鞭毛且运动的、有鞭毛但不运动的或无鞭毛且不运动的细菌进行侵袭实验。我们发现,体外实验中,有鞭毛但不运动的细菌比亲本野生型(WT)菌株更有效地侵袭仔猪上皮细胞。相比之下,无鞭毛细菌的侵袭能力与亲本菌株相比显著降低。这些结果表明,鞭毛主要作为黏附素发挥作用,增强 F18ab 大肠杆菌靶向仔猪上皮细胞的能力。

相似文献

1
Contribution of flagellin subunit FliC to piglet epithelial cells invasion by F18ab E. coli.鞭毛蛋白亚基 FliC 对 F18ab 大肠杆菌侵袭仔猪上皮细胞的作用。
Vet Microbiol. 2013 Sep 27;166(1-2):220-4. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.04.030. Epub 2013 May 22.
2
The flagella of F18ab Escherichia coli is a virulence factor that contributes to infection in a IPEC-J2 cell model in vitro.F18ab 型大肠杆菌的鞭毛是一种毒力因子,有助于体外 IPEC-J2 细胞模型中的感染。
Vet Microbiol. 2012 Nov 9;160(1-2):132-40. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 May 23.
3
Listeria monocytogenes flagella are used for motility, not as adhesins, to increase host cell invasion.单核细胞增生李斯特菌的鞭毛用于运动,而非作为黏附素,以增加对宿主细胞的侵袭。
Infect Immun. 2006 Dec;74(12):6675-81. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00886-06. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
4
An investigation of the expression and adhesin function of H7 flagella in the interaction of Escherichia coli O157 : H7 with bovine intestinal epithelium.大肠杆菌O157:H7与牛肠上皮细胞相互作用中H7鞭毛的表达及黏附功能研究
Cell Microbiol. 2009 Jan;11(1):121-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01244.x. Epub 2008 Oct 30.
5
Flagella from F18+Escherichia coli play a role in adhesion to pig epithelial cell lines.F18 鞭毛蛋白和大肠杆菌在黏附猪上皮细胞系中发挥作用。
Microb Pathog. 2013 Feb;55:32-8. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2012.09.010. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
6
Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli EtpA mediates adhesion between flagella and host cells.产肠毒素大肠杆菌EtpA介导鞭毛与宿主细胞之间的黏附。
Nature. 2009 Jan 29;457(7229):594-8. doi: 10.1038/nature07568. Epub 2008 Dec 7.
7
Adaptation of adherent-invasive to gut environment: Impact on flagellum expression and bacterial colonization ability.黏附侵袭性 向肠道环境的适应:对鞭毛表达和细菌定植能力的影响。
Gut Microbes. 2020 May 3;11(3):364-380. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2017.1421886. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
8
Use of Fimbrial Rod for F18ab Fimbriae+ STEC Colonization to Host Cells.使用菌毛杆进行F18ab菌毛+肠出血性大肠杆菌对宿主细胞的定植。
J Vis Exp. 2020 Sep 24(163). doi: 10.3791/61761.
9
Quorum-sensing gene luxS regulates flagella expression and Shiga-like toxin production in F18ab Escherichia coli.群体感应基因luxS调节F18ab大肠杆菌中鞭毛的表达和志贺样毒素的产生。
Can J Microbiol. 2014 Jun;60(6):355-61. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2014-0178. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
10
F18ab Escherichia coli flagella expression is regulated by acyl-homoserine lactone and contributes to bacterial virulence.F18ab 大肠杆菌鞭毛表达受酰高丝氨酸内酯调控,并有助于细菌毒力。
Vet Microbiol. 2013 Aug 30;165(3-4):378-83. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.04.020. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The Regulatory Role of EvfG Through Coordinated Control of Flagellar Biosynthesis and Energy Metabolism in Porcine Extraintestinal Pathogenic (ExPEC).EvfG通过协调控制猪肠道外致病性大肠杆菌(ExPEC)的鞭毛生物合成和能量代谢发挥的调节作用。
Biology (Basel). 2025 Jul 7;14(7):822. doi: 10.3390/biology14070822.
2
Characterization of novel sequence type 12531 and O8:H7 serotype carbapenem-resistant with strong swimming and intestinal epithelial cell barrier migration abilities.新型序列型12531和O8:H7血清型耐碳青霉烯菌的特性分析,该菌株具有较强的游动能力和肠道上皮细胞屏障迁移能力。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024 Dec 5;68(12):e0080524. doi: 10.1128/aac.00805-24. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
3
Bioinformatics Analysis and Spatiotemporal Distribution of the fliC Gene and Its Protein Isolated from Escherichia coli-Infected Patients in Eastern Algeria.
从阿尔及利亚东部大肠杆菌感染患者中分离出的fliC基因及其蛋白质的生物信息学分析与时空分布
Malays J Med Sci. 2024 Oct;31(5):161-195. doi: 10.21315/mjms2024.31.5.12. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
4
The bacterial flagellum as an object for optical trapping.作为光镊研究对象的细菌鞭毛。
Biophys Rev. 2024 Jul 24;16(4):403-415. doi: 10.1007/s12551-024-01212-7. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Different serotypes of Escherichia coli flagellin exert identical adjuvant effects.不同血清型的大肠埃希菌鞭毛蛋白具有相同的佐剂效应。
BMC Vet Res. 2022 Aug 12;18(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03412-3.
6
The virulence factor ychO has a pleiotropic action in an Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) strain.毒力因子ychO在一株禽致病性大肠杆菌(APEC)中具有多效性作用。
BMC Microbiol. 2016 Mar 10;16:35. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0654-2.
7
The role of the bacterial flagellum in adhesion and virulence.细菌鞭毛在黏附和毒力中的作用。
Biology (Basel). 2013 Oct 25;2(4):1242-67. doi: 10.3390/biology2041242.