Delgado M Eugenia, Olsson Magnus, Lincoln Frank A, Zhivotovsky Boris, Rehm Markus
Centre for Systems Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013 Oct;1833(10):2279-92. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.05.025. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
Apoptosis signaling crucially depends on caspase activities. Caspase-2 shares features of both initiator and effector caspases. Opinions are divided on whether caspase-2 activity is established during apoptosis initiation or execution in response to DNA damage, death receptor stimulation, or heat shock. So far, approaches towards measuring caspase-2 activity were restricted to analyses in cell homogenates and extracts, yielded inconsistent results, and were often limited in sensitivity, thereby contributing to controversies surrounding the role of caspase-2 during apoptosis. Furthermore, caspases overlap in substrate specificities, and caspase-8 as well as effector caspases may cleave the optimal VDVAD recognition motif as well. We therefore generated a highly sensitive Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) substrate to determine the relative contribution of these caspases to VDVADase activity non-invasively inside living cells. We observed limited proteolysis of the substrate during apoptosis initiation in response to death receptor stimulation by FasL, TNFα and TRAIL. However, this activity was attributable to caspase-8 rather than caspase-2. Likewise, no caspase-2-specific activity was detected during apoptosis initiation in response to genotoxic stress (cisplatin, 5-FU), microtubule destabilization (vincristine), or heat shock. The contribution of caspase-2 to proteolytic activities during apoptosis execution was insignificant. Since even residual, ectopically introduced caspase-2 activity could readily be detected inside living cells in our measurements, we conclude, in contrast to several previous studies, that caspase-2 activity does not contribute to apoptosis in the scenarios investigated, and that instead caspase-8 and effector caspases are the most significant VDVADases during canonical apoptosis signaling.
凋亡信号传导关键取决于半胱天冬酶的活性。半胱天冬酶 -2兼具起始和效应半胱天冬酶的特征。对于半胱天冬酶 -2的活性是在凋亡起始阶段还是在响应DNA损伤、死亡受体刺激或热休克的执行阶段确立,存在不同观点。到目前为止,测量半胱天冬酶 -2活性的方法仅限于在细胞匀浆和提取物中进行分析,结果不一致,且灵敏度往往有限,从而导致围绕半胱天冬酶 -2在凋亡过程中作用的争议。此外,半胱天冬酶在底物特异性上存在重叠,半胱天冬酶 -8以及效应半胱天冬酶也可能切割最佳的VDVAD识别基序。因此,我们生成了一种高灵敏度的荧光共振能量转移(FRET)底物,以在活细胞内非侵入性地确定这些半胱天冬酶对VDVAD酶活性的相对贡献。我们观察到在由FasL、TNFα和TRAIL刺激死亡受体引发凋亡起始阶段,底物的蛋白水解作用有限。然而,这种活性归因于半胱天冬酶 -8而非半胱天冬酶 -2。同样地,在响应基因毒性应激(顺铂、5-氟尿嘧啶)、微管去稳定(长春新碱)或热休克引发凋亡起始阶段,未检测到半胱天冬酶 -2特异性活性。半胱天冬酶 -2在凋亡执行阶段对蛋白水解活性的贡献微不足道。由于在我们的测量中,即使是残留的、异位引入的半胱天冬酶 -2活性在活细胞内也很容易被检测到,与之前的几项研究相反,我们得出结论,在所研究的情况下,半胱天冬酶 -2活性对凋亡没有贡献,相反,在经典凋亡信号传导过程中,半胱天冬酶 -8和效应半胱天冬酶是最重要的VDVAD酶。