Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60657, USA.
Life Sci. 2013 Jul 30;93(2-3):59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
Few studies have investigated oxygen supply/demand relations in right ventricle (RV). The current study compared changes in myocardial oxygen uptake (MVO2) and its determinants, myocardial blood flow (MBF) and oxygen extraction (EO2), in RV and left ventricle (LV) during stimulation with inotropic drugs.
Twenty-one anesthetized dogs were studied. MBF was measured with radioactive microspheres. A-VO2 difference was determined separately for RV and LV, and used to calculate MVO2 (Fick equation) and EO2. Responses to iv. infusions of isoproterenol (0.1 μg/kg/min), dobutamine (5 μg/kg/min), and amrinone (1mg/kg+10 μg/kg/min) were assessed.
Baseline MVO2 in RV was 50-60% of that in LV. The inotropes increased MVO2 in both RV and LV (range 32-63%; P<0.05). With isoproterenol, the increased MVO2 in the RV was due to increases in both MBF and EO2, whereas in LV it was due only to increases in MBF. With dobutamine and amrinone, the increased MVO2 in RV was due to increased MBF while EO2 was constant (dobutamine) or decreased (amrinone), and that in the LV was due to increased MBF while EO2 decreased.
RV possesses EO2 reserve that contributed to increased MVO2 during isoproterenol infusion, whereas LV depended on increased MBF alone. Because dobutamine and amrinone caused direct coronary vasodilation, i.e., "luxuriant perfusion," it was not necessary to recruit the EO2 reserve. Thus, it remained available to meet further increases in MVO2 or to maintain MVO2 in the face of reductions in MBF.
很少有研究调查右心室(RV)的氧供应/需求关系。本研究比较了在正性肌力药物刺激下 RV 和左心室(LV)的心肌耗氧量(MVO2)及其决定因素,即心肌血流(MBF)和氧摄取(EO2)的变化。
研究了 21 只麻醉犬。用放射性微球测量 MBF。分别测定 RV 和 LV 的 A-VO2 差,并用于计算 MVO2(Fick 方程)和 EO2。评估静脉内输注异丙肾上腺素(0.1μg/kg/min)、多巴酚丁胺(5μg/kg/min)和氨力农(1mg/kg+10μg/kg/min)的反应。
RV 的基础 MVO2 为 LV 的 50-60%。正性肌力药物增加了 RV 和 LV 的 MVO2(范围 32-63%;P<0.05)。异丙肾上腺素引起 RV 中 MVO2 的增加归因于 MBF 和 EO2 的增加,而 LV 中仅归因于 MBF 的增加。多巴酚丁胺和氨力农引起 RV 中 MVO2 的增加归因于 MBF 的增加,而 EO2 保持不变(多巴酚丁胺)或降低(氨力农),LV 中 MVO2 的增加归因于 MBF 的增加,而 EO2 降低。
RV 具有 EO2 储备,可在异丙肾上腺素输注期间增加 MVO2,而 LV 仅依赖于增加的 MBF。因为多巴酚丁胺和氨力农引起直接的冠状动脉扩张,即“奢侈灌注”,因此不需要招募 EO2 储备。因此,它仍然可用于满足 MVO2 的进一步增加,或在 MBF 减少的情况下维持 MVO2。