• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院实践中的个人绩效评估:一个框架的制定以及医生对其价值和实施态度的评估

Individual performance review in hospital practice: the development of a framework and evaluation of doctors' attitudes to its value and implementation.

作者信息

Trebble T M, Cruickshank L, Hockey P M, Heyworth N, Powell T, Clarke N

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Portsmouth Hospitals Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, , Portsmouth, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Nov;22(11):948-55. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001738. Epub 2013 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001738
PMID:23748191
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Appraisal, or independent performance review (IPR) is used in human resources management in the commercial and public sectors to evaluate the performance of an employee against agreed local organisational expectations and objectives, and to identify their requirements for development and effective management. IPR for NHS consultants may provide essential information for job planning, contribute towards medical appraisal for revalidation, and facilitate productivity and quality improvement.

AIMS

To develop a framework for IPR for consultants, and to determine attitudes on its value, process and content.

METHOD

Information from commercial, public and voluntary sector models and published and other literature sources were used to develop an IPR framework. This was assessed through a three-cycle action research methodology involving qualitative interviews with 22 consultants (predominantly with medical management roles).

RESULTS

The domains of the IPR framework included: (1) performance against objectives; (2) behaviour and leadership; (3) talent management; (4) agreed future objectives. A number of themes were identified from the consultant interviews including: ineffective current appraisal systems reflecting a lack of valid performance data and allotted time; a lack of empowerment of medical managers to address performance issues; IPR as a more explicit system, offering value in evaluating doctors performance; and the dependence of successful implementation on the engagement of the Trust executive.

CONCLUSIONS

IPR may have value for performance evaluation of consultants, contributing toward job planning and complementing medical appraisal. Support by their employing organisation and engagement with medical managers in design and implementation is likely to be essential.

摘要

背景

评估,即独立绩效审查(IPR),在商业和公共部门的人力资源管理中用于根据当地组织商定的期望和目标评估员工绩效,并确定他们的发展和有效管理需求。国民保健制度(NHS)顾问的IPR可为工作规划提供重要信息,有助于重新验证的医学评估,并促进生产力和质量提升。

目的

为顾问制定IPR框架,并确定对其价值、流程和内容的态度。

方法

利用来自商业、公共和志愿部门模式以及已发表和其他文献来源的信息来制定IPR框架。通过三轮行动研究方法对其进行评估,该方法包括对22名顾问(主要担任医疗管理职务)进行定性访谈。

结果

IPR框架的领域包括:(1)目标达成情况;(2)行为与领导力;(3)人才管理;(4)商定的未来目标。从顾问访谈中确定了一些主题,包括:当前评估系统无效,反映出缺乏有效的绩效数据和分配的时间;医疗管理人员在处理绩效问题方面缺乏自主权;IPR作为一个更明确的系统,在评估医生绩效方面具有价值;以及成功实施依赖于信托机构管理层的参与。

结论

IPR可能对顾问的绩效评估有价值,有助于工作规划并补充医学评估。其雇主组织的支持以及医疗管理人员在设计和实施中的参与可能至关重要。

相似文献

1
Individual performance review in hospital practice: the development of a framework and evaluation of doctors' attitudes to its value and implementation.医院实践中的个人绩效评估:一个框架的制定以及医生对其价值和实施态度的评估
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Nov;22(11):948-55. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001738. Epub 2013 Jun 8.
2
Clinically led performance management in secondary healthcare: evaluating the attitudes of medical and non-clinical managers.二级医疗保健中以临床为主导的绩效管理:评估医疗和非临床管理人员的态度。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Mar;24(3):212-20. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003219. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
3
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
4
Does appraisal enhance learning, improve practice and encourage continuing professional development? A survey of general practitioners' experiences of appraisal.评估能否促进学习、改善实践并鼓励持续专业发展?一项关于全科医生评估经历的调查。
Qual Prim Care. 2009;17(6):387-95.
5
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
6
A competency-based approach to public health nursing performance appraisal.一种基于能力的公共卫生护理绩效评估方法。
Public Health Nurs. 2006 Mar-Apr;23(2):115-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2006.230204.x.
7
Registered nurse participation in performance appraisal interviews.注册护士参与绩效评估面谈。
J Prof Nurs. 2007 Jan-Feb;23(1):55-9. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.11.003.
8
Managing hospital doctors and their practice: what can we learn about human resource management from non-healthcare organisations?管理医院医生及其执业行为:我们能从非医疗组织中学到哪些关于人力资源管理的知识?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 21;14:566. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0566-5.
9
Regulation of junior doctors' work hours: an analysis of British and American doctors' experiences and attitudes.初级医生工作时间的规定:对英国和美国医生经历与态度的分析
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jun;58(11):2181-91. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.016.
10
Doctors' perceptions of why 360-degree feedback does (not) work: a qualitative study.医生对 360 度反馈为何有效(无效)的看法:一项定性研究。
Med Educ. 2009 Sep;43(9):874-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03439.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinician attitude towards safety in medication management: a participatory action research study in an emergency department.临床医生对药物管理安全的态度:在急诊部的参与式行动研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 21;11(9):e047089. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047089.
2
Determining doctors' views on performance measurement and management of their clinical practice.确定医生对其临床实践的绩效评估和管理的看法。
Future Hosp J. 2015 Oct;2(3):166-170. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.2-3-166.
3
Managing hospital doctors and their practice: what can we learn about human resource management from non-healthcare organisations?
管理医院医生及其执业行为:我们能从非医疗组织中学到哪些关于人力资源管理的知识?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 21;14:566. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0566-5.