Suppr超能文献

沙格列汀在有 2 型糖尿病病史或心血管疾病风险因素的患者中的疗效和安全性:来自 3 期临床试验的汇总分析结果。

Saxagliptin efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease history or cardiovascular risk factors: results of a pooled analysis of phase 3 clinical trials.

机构信息

Medical Affairs, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE 19850, USA.

出版信息

Postgrad Med. 2013 May;125(3):145-54. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2013.05.2657.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This post hoc analysis sought to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of saxagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular (CV) risk factors or disease (CVD).

METHODS

Data from 5 randomized controlled trials were pooled to compare saxagliptin 5 mg with placebo: 2 studies of saxagliptin as monotherapy in drug-naïve patients and 1 each of saxagliptin as add-on therapy to metformin, glyburide, or a thiazolidinedione. Analysis was performed according to the following baseline/trial entry criteria: 1) history/no history of CVD; 2) ≥ 2 versus 0 to 1 CV risk factors; 3) statin use versus no statin use; and 4) hypertension versus no hypertension. Change from baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose, and postprandial glucose levels; and the proportion of patients achieving an HbA1c level < 7% were analyzed (week 24). Safety was assessed by adverse events, hypoglycemia, and body weight.

RESULTS

In total, 882 patients received saxagliptin 5 mg and 799 received placebo. Differences in adjusted mean change from baseline HbA1c (95% CI) were greater with saxagliptin compared with placebo in patients with a history of CVD (-0.64% [-0.90 to -0.38]) and no history of CVD (-0.68% [-0.78 to -0.58]); with ≥ 2 CV risk factors (-0.73% [-0.85 to -0.60]) and 0 to 1 CV risk factor (-0.62% [-0.75 to -0.48]); with statin use (-0.70% [-0.89 to -0.52]) and no statin use (-0.66% [-0.77 to -0.56]); and with hypertension (-0.69% [-0.82 to -0.57]) and no hypertension (-0.66% [-0.80 to -0.52]). Saxagliptin was well tolerated, with similar adverse event rates and types compared with placebo. There was a < 1% rate of confirmed hypoglycemia in all groups except in patients with CV history who received placebo (2.1%).

CONCLUSION

Saxagliptin improved glycemic measures, resulted in low rates of confirmed hypoglycemia, and was well tolerated in patients with or without CVD and CV risk factors.

摘要

目的

本事后分析旨在评估沙格列汀在合并心血管(CV)危险因素或疾病(CVD)的 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效、安全性和耐受性。

方法

对 5 项随机对照试验的数据进行汇总,以比较沙格列汀 5mg 与安慰剂:2 项沙格列汀作为起始单药治疗的药物研究和 1 项沙格列汀作为二甲双胍、格列吡嗪或噻唑烷二酮的附加疗法的研究。根据以下基线/试验入组标准进行分析:1)有/无 CVD 病史;2)≥2 个与 0 至 1 个 CV 危险因素;3)他汀类药物使用与未使用他汀类药物;以及 4)高血压与无高血压。分析自基线时糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、空腹血糖和餐后血糖水平的变化,以及达到 HbA1c 水平<7%的患者比例(第 24 周)。通过不良事件、低血糖和体重来评估安全性。

结果

共有 882 例患者接受沙格列汀 5mg 治疗,799 例患者接受安慰剂治疗。与安慰剂相比,在有 CVD 病史的患者(-0.64%[-0.90 至-0.38])和无 CVD 病史的患者(-0.68%[-0.78 至-0.58])、≥2 个 CV 危险因素的患者(-0.73%[-0.85 至-0.60])和 0 至 1 个 CV 危险因素的患者(-0.62%[-0.75 至-0.48])、使用他汀类药物的患者(-0.70%[-0.89 至-0.52])和未使用他汀类药物的患者(-0.66%[-0.77 至-0.56])中,沙格列汀治疗导致 HbA1c 自基线的调整平均变化(95%CI)更大。在有高血压的患者(-0.69%[-0.82 至-0.57])和无高血压的患者(-0.66%[-0.80 至-0.52])中也观察到类似的结果。沙格列汀耐受性良好,与安慰剂相比,不良反应发生率和类型相似。除了接受安慰剂的有 CVD 病史的患者(2.1%)外,所有组的确认性低血糖发生率<1%。

结论

沙格列汀改善了血糖指标,低血糖发生率低,且在合并或不合并 CVD 及 CV 危险因素的患者中均具有良好的耐受性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验