• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种用于从尿道导管获取无菌尿液标本的技术的比较。

Comparison of 2 techniques used to obtain sterile urine specimens from urethral catheters.

作者信息

Basak Tulay, Uzun Senay

机构信息

Fundamentals of Nursing Department, School of Nursing, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Nurse Spec. 2013 Jul-Aug;27(4):194-7. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0b013e3182955756.

DOI:10.1097/NUR.0b013e3182955756
PMID:23748992
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the rates of urine contamination and the frequencies of minor adverse events between the vacuum tube and injector techniques methods for the collection of sterile urine specimens.

DESIGN

This study was a cross-sectional study.

SAMPLE

The sample population was composed of patients who underwent a urodynamics procedure.

SETTING

This study was performed at the urodynamics unit of a rehabilitation and care center in Turkey.

METHODS

Sterile urine specimens (n = 576) were collected from 144 patients using the vacuum tube technique and the injector technique; the rates of urine contamination and minor adverse events were evaluated. χ2 Statistics and Fisher exact tests were used to assess the contamination rates and frequencies of minor adverse events during the collection of sterile urine specimens.

RESULTS

The contamination rate of urine specimens collected using an injector was 0.9% (P > .05). The rate of minor adverse events during specimen collection was lower when using the vacuum technique than when using an injector and sterile urine container (2 vs 36 events, P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The vacuum tube technique of urine specimen collection was not superior to the injector technique in regard to contamination. The use of the vacuum tube technique for the collection of sterile urine specimens can prevent minor adverse events related to spillage/leakage of urine.

IMPLICATIONS

More research from multiple settings and work environments is needed to strengthen the evidence base of vacuum tube technique of sterile urine specimen collection.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是比较真空管技术和注射器技术在采集无菌尿液标本时的尿液污染率及轻微不良事件的发生频率。

设计

本研究为横断面研究。

样本

样本人群由接受尿动力学检查的患者组成。

地点

本研究在土耳其一家康复护理中心的尿动力学科室进行。

方法

使用真空管技术和注射器技术从144例患者中采集无菌尿液标本(n = 576);评估尿液污染率和轻微不良事件。采用χ²检验和Fisher精确检验评估无菌尿液标本采集过程中的污染率和轻微不良事件的发生频率。

结果

使用注射器采集的尿液标本污染率为0.9%(P > .05)。使用真空技术采集标本时的轻微不良事件发生率低于使用注射器和无菌尿液容器时(2起 vs 36起事件,P < .05)。

结论

在污染方面,尿液标本采集的真空管技术并不优于注射器技术。使用真空管技术采集无菌尿液标本可预防与尿液溢出/渗漏相关的轻微不良事件。

启示

需要在多种环境和工作场景下开展更多研究,以加强无菌尿液标本采集真空管技术的证据基础。

相似文献

1
Comparison of 2 techniques used to obtain sterile urine specimens from urethral catheters.两种用于从尿道导管获取无菌尿液标本的技术的比较。
Clin Nurse Spec. 2013 Jul-Aug;27(4):194-7. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0b013e3182955756.
2
Contamination rates of different urine collection methods for the diagnosis of urinary tract infections in young children: an observational cohort study.不同尿液采集方法用于幼儿尿路感染诊断的污染率:一项观察性队列研究
J Paediatr Child Health. 2012 Aug;48(8):659-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02449.x. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
3
Evaluation of the BD Vacutainer Plus Urine C&S Preservative Tubes compared with nonpreservative urine samples stored at 4°C and room temperature.评估 BD Vacutainer Plus 尿液 C&S 防腐剂管与 4°C 和室温下未保存的尿液样本的比较。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2013 Sep;140(3):306-13. doi: 10.1309/AJCP5ON9JHXVNQOD.
4
Contamination in Adult Midstream Clean-Catch Urine Cultures in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial.急诊科成年患者清洁中段尿培养中的污染情况:一项随机对照试验
J Emerg Nurs. 2019 Sep;45(5):488-501. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2019.06.001.
5
An accurate method to obtain urine for culture in men with external catheters.
Arch Intern Med. 1987 Feb;147(2):286-8.
6
Improving clean-catch contamination rates: A prospective interventional cohort study.提高清洁中段尿污染率:一项前瞻性干预队列研究。
Emerg Med Australas. 2016 Dec;28(6):698-703. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12697. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
7
Pilot Trial of Midstream Urine Collection Device Versus Transurethral Catheter in Women With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Practicality of Use in a Clinical Setting, Patient Preferences, and Comparison of Laboratory Findings.导尿与中段尿收集装置在女性下尿路症状患者中的初步试验:在临床环境中的实用性、患者偏好,以及实验室检查结果的比较。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jun 1;27(6):371-376. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000865.
8
Use of a midstream clean catch mobile application did not lower urine contamination rates in an ED.在急诊科使用一款用于中段清洁尿样采集的移动应用程序并未降低尿液污染率。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;36(1):61-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
9
A new technique for fast and safe collection of urine in newborns.一种用于新生儿快速、安全采集尿液的新技术。
Arch Dis Child. 2013 Jan;98(1):27-9. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-301872. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
10
The Effect of Written Posted Instructions on Collection of Clean-Catch Urine Specimens in the Emergency Department.书面张贴说明对急诊科清洁中段尿标本采集的影响。
J Emerg Med. 2017 May;52(5):639-644. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Nov 1.