Kawasaki Yusuke, Kato Takao, Minamino Eri, Inoko Moriaki
Cardiovascular Center, The Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
BMJ Case Rep. 2013 Jun 6;2013:bcr2013010210. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-010210.
We present a case of syncope caused by coronary artery spasm without chest pain leading to ventricular fibrillation despite of vasodilator therapy with a calcium channel blocker (CCB). A 68-year-old man presented with two episodes of syncope without chest pain. Ergonovine provocation test induced a diffuse spasm in the right coronary artery (RCA) and subsequently, ventricular fibrillation. Under the therapy with multiple vasodilators including two CCBs, a second ergonovine provocation induced a spasm of the proximal RCA resulting in complete obstruction. Owing to drug-resistant coronary spasm complicated by ventricular fibrillation, an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) was implanted. This case report highlights the occurrence of syncope caused by coronary artery spasm without chest pain that was refractory to single CCB therapy and needed ICD implantation. Therapy with multiple vasodilators, including two or more CCBs, along with ICD implantation may be required to treat such refractory coronary artery spasms leading to lethal arrhythmia.
我们报告一例由冠状动脉痉挛引起的晕厥病例,患者无胸痛症状,尽管使用钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)进行血管扩张治疗仍导致心室颤动。一名68岁男性出现两次无胸痛的晕厥发作。麦角新碱激发试验诱发右冠状动脉(RCA)弥漫性痉挛,随后发生心室颤动。在使用包括两种CCB在内的多种血管扩张剂治疗期间,第二次麦角新碱激发试验诱发RCA近端痉挛,导致完全阻塞。由于耐药性冠状动脉痉挛并发心室颤动,植入了植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)。本病例报告强调了无胸痛的冠状动脉痉挛引起晕厥的发生,这种情况对单一CCB治疗无效,需要植入ICD。治疗此类导致致命性心律失常的难治性冠状动脉痉挛可能需要使用包括两种或更多CCB在内的多种血管扩张剂,并植入ICD。