Jansen Jan O, Lord Janet M, Thickett David R, Midwinter Mark J, McAuley Daniel F, Gao Fang
Crit Care. 2013 May 29;17(3):227. doi: 10.1186/cc12499.
Statins, in addition to their lipid-lowering properties, have anti-inflammatory actions. The aim of this review is to evaluate the effect of pre-injury statin use, and statin treatment following injury. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were searched to January 2012 for randomised and observational studies of statins in trauma patients in general, and in patients who have suffered traumatic brain injury, burns, and fractures. Of 985 identified citations, 7 (4 observational studies and 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs)) met the inclusion criteria. Two studies (both observational) were concerned with trauma patients in general, two with patients who had suffered traumatic brain injury (one observational, one RCT), two with burns patients (one observational, one RCT), and one with fracture healing (RCT). Two of the RCTs relied on surrogate outcome measures. The observational studies were deemed to be at high risk of confounding, and the RCTs at high risk of bias. Three of the observational studies suggested improvements in a number of clinical outcomes in patients taking statins prior to injury (mortality, infection, and septic shock in burns patients; mortality in trauma patients in general; mortality in brain injured patients) whereas one, also of trauma patients in general, showed no difference in mortality or infection, and an increased risk of multi-organ failure. Two of three RCTs on statin treatment in burns patients and brain injured patients showed improvements in E-selectin levels and cognitive function. The third, of patients with radial fractures, showed no acceleration in fracture union. In conclusion, there is some evidence that pre-injury statin use and post-injury statin treatment may have a beneficial effect in patients who have suffered general trauma, traumatic brain injury, and burns. However, these studies are at high risk of confounding and bias, and should be regarded as 'hypothesisgenerating'. A well-designed RCT is required to determine the therapeutic efficacy in improving outcomes in this patient population.
他汀类药物除了具有降脂特性外,还具有抗炎作用。本综述的目的是评估损伤前使用他汀类药物以及损伤后进行他汀类治疗的效果。检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE和CENTRAL数据库至2012年1月的数据,以查找关于他汀类药物在一般创伤患者以及遭受创伤性脑损伤、烧伤和骨折患者中的随机和观察性研究。在985条检索到的文献中,7篇(4篇观察性研究和3篇随机对照试验(RCT))符合纳入标准。两项研究(均为观察性研究)涉及一般创伤患者,两项涉及创伤性脑损伤患者(一项观察性研究,一项RCT),两项涉及烧伤患者(一项观察性研究,一项RCT),一项涉及骨折愈合(RCT)。其中两项RCT依赖替代结局指标。观察性研究被认为存在高度混杂风险,而RCT存在高度偏倚风险。三项观察性研究表明,损伤前服用他汀类药物的患者在一些临床结局方面有所改善(烧伤患者的死亡率、感染和感染性休克;一般创伤患者的死亡率;脑损伤患者的死亡率),而另一项同样针对一般创伤患者的研究显示死亡率或感染方面无差异,且多器官功能衰竭风险增加。三项关于烧伤患者和脑损伤患者他汀类治疗的RCT中有两项显示E选择素水平和认知功能有所改善。第三项针对桡骨骨折患者的研究显示骨折愈合未加速。总之,有一些证据表明损伤前使用他汀类药物和损伤后进行他汀类治疗可能对遭受一般创伤、创伤性脑损伤和烧伤的患者有益。然而,这些研究存在高度混杂和偏倚风险,应被视为“产生假设性”的研究。需要进行精心设计的RCT来确定在改善该患者群体结局方面的治疗效果。