Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Box 0111, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0111, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Nov;44(11):1859-1869. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5378-3. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
Using latent class analysis (LCA), we have consistently identified two distinct subphenotypes in four randomized controlled trial cohorts of ARDS. One subphenotype has hyper-inflammatory characteristics and is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Further, within three negative clinical trials, we observed differential treatment response by subphenotype to randomly assigned interventions. The main purpose of this study was to identify ARDS subphenotypes in a contemporary NHLBI Network trial of infection-associated ARDS (SAILS) using LCA and to test for differential treatment response to rosuvastatin therapy in the subphenotypes.
LCA models were constructed using a combination of biomarker and clinical data at baseline in the SAILS study (n = 745). LCA modeling was then repeated using an expanded set of clinical class-defining variables. Subphenotypes were tested for differential treatment response to rosuvastatin.
The two-class LCA model best fit the population. Forty percent of the patients were classified as the "hyper-inflammatory" subphenotype. Including additional clinical variables in the LCA models did not identify new classes. Mortality at day 60 and day 90 was higher in the hyper-inflammatory subphenotype. No differences in outcome were observed between hyper-inflammatory patients randomized to rosuvastatin therapy versus placebo.
LCA using a two-subphenotype model best described the SAILS population. The subphenotypes have features consistent with those previously reported in four other cohorts. Addition of new class-defining variables in the LCA model did not yield additional subphenotypes. No treatment effect was observed with rosuvastatin. These findings further validate the presence of two subphenotypes and demonstrate their utility for patient stratification in ARDS.
我们通过潜在类别分析(LCA),在四项急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)随机对照试验队列中一致地识别出两种截然不同的亚表型。一种亚表型具有炎症过度的特征,与更差的临床结局相关。此外,在三项阴性临床试验中,我们观察到亚表型对随机分配干预措施的治疗反应存在差异。本研究的主要目的是使用 LCA 识别感染相关 ARDS(SAILS)NHLBI 网络试验中的 ARDS 亚表型,并测试亚表型对瑞舒伐他汀治疗的治疗反应差异。
使用 SAILS 研究中的生物标志物和基线临床数据,构建 LCA 模型(n=745)。然后使用扩展的临床分类定义变量重复 LCA 建模。测试亚表型对瑞舒伐他汀治疗的治疗反应差异。
两分类 LCA 模型最适合该人群。40%的患者被归类为“炎症过度”亚表型。在 LCA 模型中加入其他临床变量并没有确定新的类别。炎症过度亚表型的 60 天和 90 天死亡率更高。在接受瑞舒伐他汀治疗与安慰剂治疗的炎症过度患者之间,未观察到结局差异。
使用两亚表型模型的 LCA 最能描述 SAILS 人群。这些亚表型具有与之前在另外四项队列中报告的特征一致。在 LCA 模型中添加新的分类定义变量并不能产生额外的亚表型。瑞舒伐他汀治疗未观察到治疗效果。这些发现进一步验证了两种亚表型的存在,并证明了它们在 ARDS 患者分层中的效用。