Interdisciplinary Center for Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Psychosom Res. 2013 Jul;75(1):1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.01.012. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
Several practice guidelines recommend routine screening for psychological distress in cancer care. The objective was to evaluate the effect of screening cancer patients for psychological distress by assessing the (1) effectiveness of interventions to reduce distress among patients identified as distressed; and (2) effects of screening for distress on distress outcomes.
CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, ISI, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and SCOPUS databases were searched through April 6, 2011 with manual searches of 45 relevant journals, reference list review, citation tracking of included articles, and trial registry reviews through June 30, 2012. Articles in any language on cancer patients were included if they (1) compared treatment for patients with psychological distress to placebo or usual care in a randomized controlled trial (RCT); or (2) assessed the effect of screening on psychological distress in a RCT.
There were 14 eligible RCTs for treatment of distress, and 1 RCT on the effects of screening on patient distress. Pharmacological, psychotherapy and collaborative care interventions generally reduced distress with small to moderate effects. One study investigated effects of screening for distress on psychological outcomes, and it found no improvement.
Treatment studies reported modest improvement in distress symptoms, but only a single eligible study was found on the effects of screening cancer patients for distress, and distress did not improve in screened patients versus those receiving usual care. Because of the lack of evidence of beneficial effects of screening cancer patients for distress, it is premature to recommend or mandate implementation of routine screening.
一些实践指南建议在癌症护理中常规筛查心理困扰。本研究旨在通过评估(1)对被识别为有困扰的患者进行干预以减轻困扰的效果;以及(2)筛查对困扰结果的影响,来评估对癌症患者进行心理困扰筛查的效果。
通过对 CINAHL、Cochrane、EMBASE、ISI、MEDLINE、PsycINFO 和 SCOPUS 数据库进行检索,检索时间截至 2011 年 4 月 6 日,同时对 45 种相关期刊进行手工检索,对纳入文章的参考文献进行回顾,对纳入文章的引文进行追踪,并对试验登记处进行了 2012 年 6 月 30 日的审查。纳入了任何语言的癌症患者的文章,如果它们(1)将有心理困扰的患者的治疗与安慰剂或常规护理进行了随机对照试验(RCT)比较;或(2)在 RCT 中评估了筛查对患者困扰的影响。
有 14 项适合治疗困扰的 RCT 和 1 项关于筛查对患者困扰影响的 RCT 符合入选标准。药物治疗、心理治疗和协作护理干预通常可以减轻困扰,效果从较小到中等。有一项研究调查了筛查对困扰的心理结局的影响,发现没有改善。
治疗研究报告称困扰症状有适度改善,但仅发现了一项适合筛查癌症患者困扰的研究,且在筛查患者与接受常规护理的患者中,困扰并未改善。由于缺乏筛查癌症患者困扰有益效果的证据,现在推荐或强制实施常规筛查还为时过早。